[1]董雨琴,宁春娇,杨喻明,等.校园景观空间冬季微气候分析和热舒适研究——以福建农林大学为例[J].江苏林业科技,2022,49(03):15-21.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.03.003]
 Dong Yuqin,Ning Chunjiao,Yang Yuming,et al.Winter microclimate and thermal comfort in campus landscape space:A case study of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2022,49(03):15-21.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.03.003]
点击复制

校园景观空间冬季微气候分析和热舒适研究——以福建农林大学为例()
分享到:

《江苏林业科技》[ISSN:1001-7380/CN:32-1236/S]

卷:
第49卷
期数:
2022年03期
页码:
15-21
栏目:
试验研究
出版日期:
2022-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Winter microclimate and thermal comfort in campus landscape space:A case study of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University
文章编号:
1001-7380(2022)03-0015-07
作者:
董雨琴宁春娇杨喻明彭兆翔黄启堂*
福建农林大学 风景园林与艺术学院,福建 福州 350100
Author(s):
Dong Yuqin Ning Chunjiao Yang Yuming Peng Zhaoxiang Huang Qitang*
College of Landscape Architecture,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350100,China
关键词:
校园景观空间冬季微气候生理等效温度热舒适度
Keywords:
Campus landscape spaceWinterMicroclimatePhysiological equivalent temperature(PET)Thermal comfort
分类号:
P412.1;X124;X16
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.03.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探讨湿热地区校园冬季不同景观空间小气候和人群热舒适情况,在福建农林大学选取6个典型空间(竹林、中华园草坪、创新楼绿地、西门广场、金山路和观音湖小路),实地开展小气候监测及问卷调查,在3个测试日中共得到调查问卷302份(有效率为95.27%)。分析比较不同景观空间的小气候差异,并依据调查结果,运用热舒适评价指标,评价不同景观空间的热舒适度。结果表明:草坪空间在冬季表现出较好的热舒适度,竹林空间和建筑中庭空间(创新楼绿地)最不舒适;研究表明,近半数人希望冬季气温升高,风速减小,太阳辐射增大; 采用回归分析法计算得出,冬季校园人体热感觉适中的生理等效温度(PET)为17.3 ℃,热感觉适中的PET范围在15.7—18 ℃;热舒适的PET范围为17.9—23.1 ℃;80%的人群热可接受率所对应的PET≥16.2 ℃。该研究结果为优化校园景观空间的规划设计和后期管理提出了参考依据。
Abstract:
To learn the microclimate of different landscape spaces and people’s thermal comfort in humid areas in winter, 6 typical spaces were selected in the campus of Fujian agriculture and Forestry University to carry out microclimate monitoring and questionnaire survey. A total of 302 questionnaires (95.27% effective rate) were obtained in 3 test days. After the microclimate difference of landscape spaces analyzed, the thermal comfort of different landscape spaces was further evaluated by means of thermal comfort indices. The results showed: (1) According to the thermal comfort questionnaire, lawn space was shown as better thermal comfort environment in winter while bamboo forest space and building atrium space were least comfortable; (2) Nearly half of people in hope of air temperature rise, wind speed decrease and solar radiation increase in winter; (3) Regression analysis with 17.3 ℃ PET (physiological equivalent temperature) to thermal sensation neutrality, the PET range of 15.7—18 ℃ to thermal neutrality; 17.9—23.1 ℃ to thermal comfort, and at least 16.2 ℃ PET, corresponding to 80% acceptance rate. This research provides a reference for optimizing the planning, design and later management with campus landscape space.

参考文献/References:

[1]姚亚男,李树华.基于公共健康的城市绿色空间相关研究现状[J].中国园林,2018,34(1):118-124.
[2]陈聪.校园环境与思想、意识、文化的融合[D].武汉:理工大学,2006.
[3]金虹,乔梁,崔鹏.基于户外活动的严寒地区校园冬季热舒适度研究[J].建筑科学,2021,37(8):87-92.
[4]高云飞,余佳宁,刘琳,等.湿热地区校园公共空间冬季热舒适研究[J].广东工业大学学报,2021,38(1):39-45.
[5]杨丽娜,刘吉营,任婧,等.过渡季节特殊天气下校园室外热舒适研究[J].山东建筑大学学报,2021,36(1):75-82.
[6]薛秋华,余振辉,翁善波.校园绿地景观的营造与配置——以福建农林大学校园绿地植物配置为例[J].福建农林大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,10(3): 125-128.
[7]翁羽西,朱玉洁,董嘉莹,等.校园绿地声景观对情绪和注意力的影响——以福建农林大学为例[J].中国园林,2021,37(2):88-93.
[8]HEATING A S O. 2012 ASHRAE handbook[M]. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE Research, 2012.
[9]许敏.城市公园绿地不同景观空间热舒适研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2019.
[10]MATZARAKIS A, RUTZ F, MAYER H.Modelling radiation fluxes in simple and complex environments: basics of the RayMan model[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology,2009, 54(2):131-139.
[11]张磊,孟庆林.湿热地区大学校园夏季热环境测试与分析[J].建筑科学,2011,27(2):48-51.
[12]彭海峰,杨小乐,金荷仙,等.校园人群活动空间夏季小气候及热舒适研究[J].中国园林,2017, 33(12): 47-52.
[13]刘滨谊,彭旭路.上海南京东路热舒适分析与评价[J].风景园林,2019, 26(4): 83-88.
[14]魏冬雪,刘滨谊.上海创智天地广场热舒适分析与评价[J].中国园林,2018, 34(2): 5-12.
[15]LIN T P, MATZARAKIS A. Tourism climate and thermal comfort in Sun Moon Lake, Taiwan[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology, 2008, 52(4):281-290.
[16]KLEMM W, HEUSINKVELD B G, LENZHOLZER S, et al. Psychological and physical impact of urban green spaces on outdoor thermal comfort during summertime in The Netherlands[J].Building and Environment,2015, 83:120-128.

相似文献/References:

[1]丁晶晶,仇曙光,李冬林,等.江苏句容仑山冬季鸟类群落结构及其多样性研究[J].江苏林业科技,2016,43(04):10.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.04.003]
 DING Jing-jing,QIU Shu-guang,LI Dong-lin,et al.Community structure and diversity of winter birds in Lunshan Hill,Jurong, Jiangsu Province[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2016,43(03):10.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.04.003]
[2]郭少荣,陈凡,李一琳*.南京市仙林大学城冬季鸟类多样性初步调查——以文澜路3所高校为例[J].江苏林业科技,2019,46(02):25.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2019.02.007]
 Guo Shaorong,Chen Fan,Li Yilin*.Preliminary survey of winter bird diversity in Xianlin University Town,Nanjing—taking three universities in Wenlan Road for example[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2019,46(03):25.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2019.02.007]
[3]孙利强,袁德强,刘子茵,等.郑州市35种冬季观果植物的综合评价[J].江苏林业科技,2020,47(01):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.01.001]
 Sun Liqiang,Yuan Deqiang,Liu Ziyin,et al.Comprehensive evaluation of 35 winter ornamental fruit plants in Zhengzhou[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2020,47(03):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.01.001]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-03-31;修回日期:2022-04-25
基金项目:福建农林大学科技发展基金“因应气候变化的高密度城市生态屋顶规划应用研究”(CXZX2020126B)
作者简介:董雨琴(2000- ),女,湖南怀化人,硕士研究生。主要从事园林与景观设计研究。
*通信作者:黄启堂(1963- ),男,福建尤溪人,教授,硕士生导师。主要从事风景园林规划与设计研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-08-08