[1]朱振贤,陈春秋,陈海清,等.金华磐安县大盘山地区自然保护地土壤质量评价[J].江苏林业科技,2025,52(05):9-15.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2025.05.002]
　Zhu Zhenxian,Chen Chunqiu,Chen Haiqing,et al.Soil quality evaluation of nature protected areas in Dapanshan area of Pan’an County, Jinhua[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2025,52(05):9-15.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2025.05.002]
点击复制

金华磐安县大盘山地区自然保护地土壤质量评价

《江苏林业科技》[ISSN:1001-7380/CN:32-1236/S]

卷:
第52卷
期数:
2025年05期
页码:
9-15
栏目:
试验研究
出版日期:
2025-10-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Soil quality evaluation of nature protected areas in Dapanshan area of Pan’an County, Jinhua
文章编号:
1001-7380（2025）05-0009-07
作者:
朱振贤1; 陈春秋2; 陈海清3; 倪张林2; 汪锦辉1*
1. 浙江省森林资源监测中心，浙江 杭州 310023；
2. 中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业研究所，浙江 富阳 311400；
3. 大盘山国家级自然保护区管理局，浙江 金华 322399
Author(s):
Zhu Zhenxian1;  Chen Chunqiu2;  Chen Haiqing3;  Ni Zhangli2;  Wang Jinhui1*
1. Zhejiang Provincial Forest Resources Monitoring Center, Hangzhou 310023, China;
2.Research Institute of SubtropicalForestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry，Fuyang 311400, China;
3.Administration Bureau of DapanshanNational Nature Reserve，Jinhua 322399, China
关键词:
自然保护地; 最小数据集; 土壤质量评价; 土壤酸化; 大盘山
Keywords:
Nature protected area;  Minimum data set(MDS);  Soil quality evaluation;  Soil acidification;  Dapanshan
分类号:
Q142.3；S153；S158.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2025.05.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为解决自然保护地土壤质量传统评估方法指标冗余、操作复杂的问题，该研究旨在为金华磐安县大盘山地区构建一套高效可靠的土壤质量评价最小数据集（MDS）。以区内4个典型自然保护地为对象，测定土壤有机碳、全氮等9项理化指标，综合运用主成分分析（PCA）和相关性分析筛选关键指标，建立MDS，并采用土壤质量指数法（SQI）进行评价。结果显示：研究区土壤整体呈酸性（pH=4.55—4.99），不同保护地间土壤养分含量差异显著，最终筛选出有机碳、容重、田间持水量、有效磷和pH值5个关键指标构成MDS，且与全数据集（TDS）的SQI呈极显著相关（R2=0.92），证实了MDS的可靠性。土壤质量评价结果显示，自然保护区的SQI最高。该研究揭示土壤酸化是制约该地区土壤质量的关键因子，所构建的MDS为自然保护地土壤质量的长期、高效监测提供了有力工具。基于此，建议采取以生物改良为主的酸化土壤修复策略，并实施差异化的养分管理，以服务于区域生态保护的精准决策。
Abstract:
To avoid redundant indicators and complicated operation of the traditional evaluation method of soil quality in nature protected area, this study aimed to construct a set of efficient and reliable minimum data set (MDS) for soil quality evaluation in Dapanshan of Pan’an County, Jinhua. Taking four typical areas as the research objects, nine physical and chemical indicators including soil organic carbon and total nitrogen were determined. The key indicators were screened by using principal component analysis (PCA) and correlation analysis, and further MDS was established, and the soil quality index method (SQI) was used for evaluation. The results showed that the soil in the study area was acidic (pH=4.55—4.99), and the soil nutrient content was significantly different among different areas. Finally, such five key indicators as organic carbon, bulk density, field water holding capacity, available phosphorus and pH value were selected to form MDS, which was significantly correlated with SQI of the total data set (TDS) (R2=0.92), confirming the reliability of MDS. The results of soil quality evaluation showed that the SQI of National Nature Reserve was the highest. This study revealed that soil acidification was key restricting factor in the areas, and the constructed MDS could provide a powerful tool for long-term and efficient monitoring of soil quality in the areas. Based on these, it was suggested adopting the acidification soil remediation strategy based on biological improvement, and implementing differentiated nutrient management to serve the precise decision-making of regional ecological protection.

参考文献/References:

[1]初阳.磐安获践行“两山”理念突出贡献奖[J].绿色中国,2019(20):34-39.
[2]朱智翔,晏利扬.磐安：用绿水青山换来金山银山[J].绿色中国,2019(20):76-79.
[3]杨一凡,王柯宇,徐贤飞,等.“浙产好药”迈向新赛道[N].浙江日报, 2024-09-17(003).
[4]宋金阳.浙江省磐安县植物分布及多样性调查分析[D].南京:南京林业大学,2024.
[5]DORAN J W,JONES A J.Methods for assessing soil quality[M].Madison, SA:Soil Science Society of America Special Publications,1996.
[6]LIU Z,FU B, IU G,et al.Soil quality: Concept,indicators and its assessment[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2006,26(3): 901-913.
[7]LARSON W E,PIERCE F J.The dynamics of soil quality as a measure of sustainable management[J].Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment,1994,35: 37-51.
[8]王晓婷,姚童言,陈瑞蕊,等.基于最小数据集评价长期不同施肥对潮土土壤质量的影响[J].土壤,2025,7(15):1-10.
[9]ZHANG G L,BAI J H, XI M,et al.Soil quality assessment of coastal wetlands in the Yellow River Delta of China based on the minimum data set[J]. Ecological Indicators,2016,66:458-466.[10]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000．
[11]李霞,朱万泽,舒树淼,等.基于主成分分析的大渡河中游干暖河谷草地土壤质量评价[J].生态学报,2021, 41(10):3891-3900．
[12]丁明净,脱云飞,郑阳,基于最小数据集栗子坪自然保护区不同林分类型土壤质量评价[J].土壤通报, 2024,55(5):1215-1228.
[13]田英,许喆,王娅丽,等.宁夏银川平原沙化土地不同人工林土壤质量评价[J].生态学报,2023, 43(4):1515-1525.
[14]刘利昆,赵广举,穆兴民,等.基于最小数据集的青藏公路沿线土壤质量评价[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(2): 125-131．
[15]MA H Y,ZHOU J,GE J Y,et al.Intercropping improves soil ecosystem multifunctionality through enhanced available nutrients but depends on regional factors[J]. Plant and Soil, 2022, 480(1):71-84.[16]中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1978.
[17]张荣,李婷婷,金锁,等.人为干扰对蒙顶山木荷次生林物种多样性及土壤理化性质的影响[J].浙江农林大学学报,2020,37(5): 867-875.
[18]SILVER W L,MIYA R K. Global patterns in root decomposition:Comparisons of climate and litter quality effects[J].Oecologia,2001,129(3):407-419.
[19]张昆,吕宪国,田昆.纳帕海高原湿地土壤有机质对水分梯度变化的响应[J].云南大学学报(自然科学版),2008,30(4):424-427.
[20]窦荣鹏,江洪,余树全,等.4种亚热带树木凋落叶的分解研究[J].浙江林学院学报,2010,27(2):163-169.
[21]李静,夏尚光,石晓芸,等.亚热带丛枝和外生菌根森林土壤酸缓冲性能及其主要影响因素[J].生态学杂志,2024,43(11): 3333-3340.
[22]吴倩倩,朱永恒,白钰鹏,等.旅游活动对土壤健康的影响研究进展[J].生态科学,2024,43(5):223-230.
[23]张福锁.测土配方施肥技术要览[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2006.
[24]杜芳芳,童根平,郭瑞,等.浙江亚热带自然保护区土壤养分空间异质性及其影响因素[J].浙江农林大学学报,2023,40(1):145-154.
[25]侯晓峰,孙志高,宋振阳,等.氮负荷增强条件下闽江河口芦苇湿地表层土壤氮磷含量动态变化特征[J].环境科学学报,2025,45(10): 394-410.
[26]朱寒松.土壤和团聚体氮素矿化对水热条件的响应特征研究[D].陕西:西北农林科技大学,2018.
[27]张维理, KOLBE H,张认连.土壤有机碳作用及转化机制研究进展[J].中国农业科学,2020,53(2):317-331.
[28]李致博.土壤酸化对养分淋失、微生物多样性及柑橘生长的影响[D].福建:福建农林大学,2020.
[29]张丽芳,胡海林.土壤酸碱性对植物生长影响的研究进展[J].贵州农业科学,2020,48(8):40-43.
[30]黄彩凤,梁晶晶,张燕林,等.森林凋落物特性及对土壤生态功能影响研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2021, 34(4):20-25.
[31]张和芬,孙瑞,杨川,等.基于最小数据集的云南橡胶林土壤质量评价[J].西北林学院学报,2025,40(1):59-69,103.
[32]朱鸣鸣,徐镀涵,陈光燕,等.于最小数据集的喀斯特不同利用方式下土壤质量评价[J].草地学报,2021,29(10):2323-2331.

相似文献/References:

[1]柳絮飞,闵梦月,罗琚,等.南通市崇山区军山自然保护地与公园景区鸟类群落调查分析[J].江苏林业科技,2020,47(01):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.01.005]
　Liu Xufei,Min Mengyue,Luo Ju,et al.Bird differences between Junshan Nature Reserve and urban parks[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2020,47(05):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.01.005]
[2]祝亚云,王磊,江浩*.江苏风景名胜区与其他5类自然保护地交叉重叠分析[J].江苏林业科技,2022,49(01):24.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.01.004]
[3]祝亚云,王磊,谢斐,等.江苏省自然保护地组成结构和分布特征研究[J].江苏林业科技,2022,49(02):29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.02.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2025-07-27;修回日期：2025-08-11
基金项目：磐安县自然保护地生物多样性长期监测样地建设项目(ZJXXPAGK2023-018)
作者简介：朱振贤（1981- ），男，江苏昆山人，工程师，硕士。主要从事林业调查规划研究。E-mail: sinpig@163.com
*通信作者：汪锦辉（1982- ），男，安徽黄山人，高级工程师，硕士。主要从事林业调查规划及监测工作。E-mail:36262580@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2026-01-13