[1]胡玉玲,蔡芳丽,卢海燕,等.油茶林地夏季水分管理对油茶产量指标的影响[J].江苏林业科技,2018,45(03):23-27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.03.006]
 Hu Yuling,Cai Fangli,Lu Haiyan,et al.Effect of different irrigation way in summer on oil-tea camellia yield index[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2018,45(03):23-27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.03.006]
点击复制

油茶林地夏季水分管理对油茶产量指标的影响()
分享到:

《江苏林业科技》[ISSN:1001-7380/CN:32-1236/S]

卷:
第45卷
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
23-27
栏目:
试验研究
出版日期:
2018-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of different irrigation way in summer on oil-tea camellia yield index
文章编号:
1001-7380(2018)01-0023-05
作者:
胡玉玲 蔡芳丽 卢海燕 罗海秀 贺姣凤
湖南应用技术学院农林科技学院, 湖南常德415100
Author(s):
Hu Yuling Cai Fangli Lu Haiyan Luo Haixiu He Jiaofeng
College of Agriculture and Forestry,Hunan Institute of Applied Technology, Changde 415100, China
关键词:
油茶林夏季水分管理成果率茶果指标
Keywords:
Oil-tea Camellia plantationSummerWater managementFruit-setting ratioFruit indicator
分类号:
S794.4
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.03.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探讨水分管理对油茶产量的影响,提高水分利用率,为夏季油茶林地管理提供依据,选择‘长林18’和‘湘林210’油茶为试验材料,分别进行滴灌、喷灌和漫灌处理,对各处理油茶相关指标进行观察和测定。结果表明:不同品种和灌溉方式对油茶成果率、果型大小、籽重、出籽率、籽含水率及仁出油率等的影响差异显著,‘长林18’用滴灌方式进行灌溉,油茶成果率最高,达到了97.07%;‘湘林210’用喷灌方式进行灌溉,油茶成果率最高,达到了91.27%。漫灌处理‘湘林210’果型最大,而‘长林18’果型最大是滴灌或者喷灌处理,滴灌处理油茶平均果质量和鲜籽质量较大;‘湘林210’喷灌处理,鲜籽含水率及出仁率较高(64.69%),滴灌处理鲜籽含水率最低(47.17%),而仁出油率最高(51.88%),‘长林18’滴灌处理鲜籽含水率最高,未进行灌溉处理鲜籽含水率最低(39.88%),出仁率较高(59.28%),进行喷灌处理仁出油率最高(48.66%)。
Abstract:
In order to investigate the effects of water management on the yield of oil-tea Camellia, to improve water use efficiency in summer, such variety plantations of Camellia oleifera Abel as ‘Changlin 18’ and ‘Xianglin 210’ were given for drip irrigation, sprinkle irrigation and flood irrigation tests respectively, and then the related indexes were observed and measured. The results showed that different varieties combined with different irrigation manner had a significant effect on their harvest rate, fruit size, seed weight, seed yield, seed moisture and seed oil rate. The fruit-setting rate of ‘Changlin 18’ got the highest (97.07%) by drip irrigation while that of ‘Xianglin 210’ got the highest (91.27%) by sprinkle irrigation. The fruit of ‘Xianglin 210’ was bigger by flood irrigation while the fruit of ‘Changlin 18’ bigger by drip irrigation or sprinkle irrigation, with higher average fruit and fresh seed weights only by drip irrigation. As for ‘Changlin 210’, the fresh seed moisture and kernel rate of was higher (64.69%) by sprinkle irrigation, and the moisture of fresh seed was the lowest (47.17%) while seed oil output was the highest (51.88%) by drip irrigation. And for ‘Changlin 18’, the fresh seed moisture was highest by drip irrigation, the fresh seed moisture got the lowest (39.88%) but a high kernel rate (59.28%) without irrigation, and it's kernel oil yield was the highest (48.66%) by sprinkle irrigation.

参考文献/References:

[1]庄瑞林.中国油茶: 2 版[M].北京:中国林业出版社, 2008.
[2]龙 伟,姚小华.持续干旱对云南文山油茶的生长影响研究[J].安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(34): 16662-16663.
[3]陈永忠,罗健,陈隆升,等.湖南省油茶旱害及防治对策[J].经济林研究, 2014, 32(3): 22-29,53.
[4]丁少净,钟秋平,袁婷婷,等.干旱胁迫对油茶叶片内源激素及果实生长的影响[J].林业科学研究, 2016, 29(6): 933-939.
[5]钟飞霞,王瑞辉,李婷,等.土壤水分对油茶果实主要经济指标的影响[J].经济林研究, 2015, 33(4):32-37.
[6]徐猛.不同水分梯度对油茶果实品质和产量的影响[D].南昌:江西农业大学, 2014.
[7]陈志钢,马履一,陈凤,等.土壤水分对油茶苗木气体交换及耗水规律的影响[J].北京林业大学学报, 2014, 36(3): 48-56.
[8]曹永庆,姚小华,龙伟.高温干旱对油茶生长的影响[J].林业科技开发, 2014, 28(4): 34-37.
[9]左继林.油茶高产无性系对干旱胁迫及抗旱措施的响应[D].南京:南京林业大学, 2014.
[10]袁惠君.油茶无性系“赣石83-4”对水肥胁迫响应的生理生化机制研究[D].南昌:江西农业大学, 2012.
[11]钟红舰,魏红,汪红.索氏抽提法测定粗脂肪含量改进[J].粮食与油脂, 2003, 29(12): 37-38.
[12]TANG Q Y, ZHANG C X.Data processing system (dps) software with experimental design, statistical analysis and data mining developed for use in entomological research[J].Insect Science, 2013, 20(2): 254-260.
[13]曾燕如,黎章矩.油茶花期气候对花后坐果的影响[J].浙江林学院学报, 2010, 27(3): 323-328.
[14]陈庆潮,邱劲柏,林金凤.油茶落花落果成因及防控技术[J].湖南林业科技, 2016, 43(5): 128-130.
[15]漆龙霖,李克瑞,刘煊章,等.油茶喷灌试验[J].喷灌技术,1985(1): 18-23.
[16]白玉杰.水肥耦合对油茶生长及土壤性状的影响[D].南京:南京林业大学, 2013.
[17]王瑞辉,钟飞霞,廖文婷,等.土壤水分对油茶果实生长的影响[J].林业科学, 2014, 50(12): 40-46.
[18]李志真,谢一青,兰思仁,等.小果油茶优良林分产量结构研究[C]∥“木本粮油产业发展森林食品质量安全”学术研讨会暨华东六省一市林学会学术年会论文集.杭州:浙江省林学会, 2015:245-252.

相似文献/References:

[1]曹春燕,尹原森,陈勇明,等.夏季修剪对幼龄凤丹生长结果的影响[J].江苏林业科技,2017,44(02):26.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2017.02.006]
[2]付红梅,曹 华,温从育.有机碳肥对油茶林地土壤养分和产量的影响[J].江苏林业科技,2017,44(03):31.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2017.03.008]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-05-21;修回日期:2018-05-29
基金项目:湖南省教育厅项目“水分对油茶成果率的影响”(16B187);常德市重大油茶专项“油茶新造林节水抗旱栽培技术研究”(2015ZD16);常德市重大项目“油茶配方有机肥研制”(2013ZX23)
作者简介:胡玉玲(1977- ),男,浙江文成人,讲师,博士。主要从事经济林栽培和育种研究。E-mail: huyulin@126.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-08-01