[1]宋孜闻,于杨.影响松材线虫传播的生物化学物质[J].江苏林业科技,2024,51(02):53-56.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2024.02.009]
 Song Ziwen,Yu Yang.Biochemical substances in the transmission of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2024,51(02):53-56.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2024.02.009]
点击复制

影响松材线虫传播的生物化学物质()
分享到:

《江苏林业科技》[ISSN:1001-7380/CN:32-1236/S]

卷:
第51卷
期数:
2024年02期
页码:
53-56
栏目:
综述与专论
出版日期:
2024-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Biochemical substances in the transmission of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus
文章编号:
1001-7380(2024)02-0053-04
作者:
宋孜闻1于杨2
1.江苏省林业科学研究院, 江苏 南京 211153;
2. 纵腾集团,荷兰 北荷兰省 143729EP
Author(s):
Song Ziwen1 Yu Yang2
1.Jiangsu Academy of Forestry,Nanjing 211153,China;
2. Zongteng Group,The Netherlands North Holland 1437EP
关键词:
松材线虫媒介昆虫松褐天牛生物化学物质
Keywords:
Bursaphelenchus xylophilus Vector insect Monochamus alternatus Biochemical substance
分类号:
S763.38;S763.49
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2024.02.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
松树萎蔫病是导致我国松林资源严重受损的主要原因之一,该病的传播主要是由于健康松树被寄生于媒介昆虫上的松材线虫侵染所引发。该文介绍了影响媒介昆虫松褐天牛携带松材线虫传播的生物化学物质。在松材线虫进入媒介昆虫体内过程中,脂肪酸、挥发性萜烯、碳氢化合物和CO2发挥重要调控作用;在媒介昆虫寻找寄主过程中,会受到寄主植物产生的挥发物质萜烯和碳氢化合物的影响;松材线虫体内的中性脂质含量高低是决定松材线虫从媒介昆虫脱落挥发物释放的化学开关。
Abstract:
Pine wilt disease(PWD) is one of the main causes of serious damage to pine forest resources in China. The spread of PWD is mainly caused by the infection of healthy pine trees by Bursaphelenchus xylophilus parasitic on vectors. In this paper, the biochemical substances in the transmission of B. xylophilus carried by the vector insect Monochamus alternatus were introduced. Fatty acids, volatile terpenes, hydrocarbons and CO2 play an important role in the process of B. xylophilus entering the vector insect;In the process of searching for hosts, vector insects will be affected by volatile terpenes and hydrocarbons produced by host plants;The content of neutral lipids in B. xylophilus is the chemical switch that determines the release of volatiles from vector insects.

参考文献/References:

[1]WU F, DENG L N, WU X Q, et al. Expression profiling of autophagy genes BxATG1 and BxATG8 under biotic and abiotic stresses in pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2017, 18(12): 2639.
[2]XU H C, LUO Y Q. Ecosystems attacked by Bursaphelenchus xylophilus: a review[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2010, 27(3): 445-450.
[3]PIMENTEL C, KHAN M R, ZHENG Y, et al. Nematode problems in forests and their sustainable management[J]. Nematode Diseases of Crops and their Sustainable Management, 2023: 457-493.
[4]ARAKAWA Y, TOGASHI K. Newly discovered transmission pathway of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus from males of the beetle Monochamus alternatus to Pinus densiflora trees via oviposition wounds[J]. Journal of Nematology, 2002, 34(4): 396.
[5]VICENTE C, ESPADA M, VIEIRA P, et al. Pine wilt disease: a threat to European forestry[J]. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2012, 133: 89-99.
[6]朱丽华,章欣月,夏馨蕊,等.无细菌松材线虫对马尾松的致病性[J]. 林 业 科 学, 2020, 56(7):63-69.
[7]KIM B N, KIM J H, AHN J Y, et al. A short review of the pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences, 2020, 12: 297-304.
[8]张建军,张润志,陈京元.松材线虫媒介昆虫种类及其扩散能力[J].浙江林学院学报,2007,24( 3):350-356.
[9]AIKAWA T. Transmission biology of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in relation to its insect vector[M]//Pine wilt disease. Tokyo: Springer Japan, 2008: 123-138.
[10]AN Y, LI Y, MA L, et al. The Changes of microbial communities and key metabolites after early Bursaphelenchus xylophilus Invasion of Pinus massoniana[J]. Plants, 2022, 11(21): 2849.
[11]ZHAO L, ZHANG S, WEI W, et al. Chemical signals synchronize the life cycles of a plant-parasitic nematode and its vector beetle[J]. Current Biology, 2013, 23(20): 2038-2043.
[12]AMINISARTESHNIZI M. Lipid content in the juvenile, female and male of Acrobeles complexus nematode[J]. Research on Crops, 2021, 22(1): 167-170.
[13]MAEHARA N, FUTAI K. Presence of the cerambycid beetles Psacothea hilaris and Monochamus alternatus affecting the life cycle strategy of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. Nematology, 2001, 3(5): 455-461.
[14]FUTAI K. Pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2013, 51: 61-83.
[15]PIMENTEL C S, FIRMINO P N, AYRES M P. Interactions between pinewood nematodes and the fungal community of pine trees[J]. Fungal Ecology, 2021, 51: 101046.
[16]TOGASHI K, MIYAUCHIi O, KUSUMOTO D, et al. Commensal relation between Bursaphelenchus xylophilus(Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) and Monochamus alternatus(Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) within pine trees[J]. Applied Entomology and Zoology, 2016, 51: 53-62.
[17]HAO D, YANG J. Research progress and prospect on chemical ecology of Monochamus alternatus[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2008, 27(7): 1227.
[18]SHEN L, LIN X, LIU F, et al. Early diagnosis of pine wood nematode disease based on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and organic acids[J]. Forests, 2023, 14(8): 1582.
[19]MAEHARA N, TOKORO M. Effect of unsaturated fatty acids around pupal chambers of Monochamus alternatus(Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and Acanthocinus orientalis(Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on the number of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus(Nematoda: Parasitaphelenchidae) carried by the beetles[J]. Nematology, 2010, 12(5): 721-729.
[20]LI H, SHEN P, FU P, et al. Characteristics of the emergence of Monochamus alternatus, the vector of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus(Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae), from Pinus thunbergii logs in Nanjing, China, and of the transmission of the nematodes through feeding wounds[J]. Nematology, 2007, 9(6): 807-816.
[21]STAMPS W T, LINIT M J. Interaction of intrinsic and extrinsic chemical cues in the behaviour of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus(Aphelenchida: Aphelenchoididae) in relation to its beetle vectors[J]. Nematology, 2001, 3(4): 295-301.
[22]ZHAO L L, WEI W, KANG L, et al. Chemotaxis of the pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, to volatiles associated with host pine, Pinus massoniana, and its vector Monochamus alternatus[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2007, 33:1207-1216.
[23]ZHENG Y, YANG Z, WANG X, et al. Chemotaxis of plant parasitic nematodes: A review[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2014, 33(3): 837.
[24]WANG Y, CHEN F, WANG L, et al. Study of the departure of pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus(Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) from Monochamus alternatus(Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)[J]. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 2020, 23(4): 981-987.
[25]IKEDA T, ODA K, YAMANE A, et al. Volatiles from pine logs as the attractant for the Japanese pine sawyer Monochamus alternatus Hope(Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)[J]. Journal of the Japanese Forestry Society, 1980, 62(4): 150-152.
[26]IFAN J T, SUN J H. Influences of host volatiles on feeding behaviour of the Japanese pine sawyer, Monochamus alternatus[J]. Journal of Applied Entomology, 2006, 130(4): 238-244.
[27]IKEDA T, YAMANE A, ENDA N, et al. Attractiveness of volatile components of felled pine trees for Monochamus alternatus(Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)[J]. Journal of the Japanese Forestry Society, 1986, 68(1): 15-19.
[28]KELSEY R G, OSEPH G. Ethanol in ponderosa pine as an indicator of physiological injury from fire and its relationship to secondary beetles[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2003, 33(5): 870-884.
[29]曹金亮.松墨天牛种群动态与不同健康马尾松林分的关系[J].生物灾害科学,2014,37(2):129-133.
[30]王玲萍,钟景辉,何学友,等.福建省泉州市松墨天牛的生活史与生物学特性[J].福建林业科技,2020,47(2):77-81.
[31]刘博.松墨天牛化学通讯机理研究与高效引诱剂的研制[D].杭州:浙江农林大学,2012.
[32]SHI X F, DING X L, SHI L N, et al. Effects of several chemicals on the migration behavior of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus(Steiner & Buhrer) Nickle[J]. Forests, 2021, 12(6): 771.
[33]TIAN H K, ZHAO L L, KOSKI T M, et al. Microhabitat governs the microbiota of the pinewood nematode and its vector beetle: implication for the prevalence of pine wilt disease[J]. Microbiology Spectrum, 2022, 10(4): e0078322.
[34]LVAREZ G, GALLEGO D, HALL D R, et al. Combining pheromone and kairomones for effective trapping of the pine sawyer beetle Monochamus galloprovincialis[J]. Journal of Applied Entomology, 2016, 140(1-2): 58-71.
[35]孙江华,韦卫,赵莉蔺,等.用于诱集繁殖型松材线虫的化学诱剂:200610011214.4[P].2007.[36]郝德君,樊斌琦,唐进根,等.松墨天牛引诱剂的筛选及其引诱作用[J].东北林业大学学报,2009,37(11):86-87.
[37]赵锦年,蒋平,张星耀,等.松褐天牛缓释型引诱剂及其引诱效果研究[J].林业科学研究,2011,24(3):350-356.
[38]唐伟强,吴沧松,吴银海.几种诱捕松墨天牛方法的效果分析[J].浙江林学院学报,2000(3):106-108.
[39]蒋丽雅,朋金和,周健生,等.松褐天牛引诱剂Mat-1号的研究[J].森林病虫通讯,1997(3):5-7.
[40]马向阳,冯志敏,余华洋,等.4种引诱剂及配套诱捕器诱捕松墨天牛效果比较[J].林业科技通讯,2018(11):51-53.
[41]梁玮莎,余海滨,谢伟忠,等.松褐天牛不同引诱剂和诱捕器组合诱捕效能比较[J].广东林业科技,2015,31(4):6-9.
[42]温小遂,喻爱林,唐艳龙,等.4种引诱剂林间诱捕松墨天牛效果比较[J].林业科学研究,2017,30(5):765-770.
[43]钱明惠,方海鹏,黄泽翰,等.松褐天牛聚集信息素引诱剂林间诱捕作用[J].林业与环境科学,2018,34(3):47-50.
[44]李祥康,黄焕华,范军祥,等.林分因子对松褐天牛引诱剂诱捕效果的影响[J].中国森林病虫,2013,32(6):21-23,26.
[45]王义平,郭瑞,张真.4种国产引诱剂对松墨天牛诱捕效果的比较分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2012,34(3):142-144.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨希,陈伟,黄金水,等.不同培养方法对松材线虫鉴定的影响[J].江苏林业科技,2016,43(02):5.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.02.002]
 YANG Xi,CHEN Wei,HUANG Jin-shui,et al.Effect of different culture method on the identification of Bursaphlenchus xylophilus[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2016,43(02):5.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.02.002]
[2]陈 伟.阿维菌素乳油注干防治松材线虫病的效果[J].江苏林业科技,2017,44(04):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2017.04.007]
[3]曾丽琼,何学友,蔡守平,等.具杀松材线虫活性细菌的筛选和鉴定[J].江苏林业科技,2018,45(02):6.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.02.002]
 ZENG Li-qiong,HE Xue-you,CAI Shou-ping,et al.Selection and identification of the bacterium with nematicidal activity to Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2018,45(02):6.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.02.002]
[4]叶利芹,刘俊,熊大斌,等.江苏主要林业有害生物发生危害情况[J].江苏林业科技,2019,46(01):25.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2019.01.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2024-01-07;修回日期:2024-02-26
作者简介:宋孜闻(1992- ),女,江苏南京人,硕士。主要从事森林及自然资源保护工作。E-mail:xiaowenziwenzi@163.com
*通信作者:于杨(1989- ),男,河北唐山人,硕士。主要从事森林及自然资源保护工作。
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-07-02