[1]沈年华.紫金山栓皮栎群落主要乔木种群的种间联结性[J].江苏林业科技,2022,49(03):42-47.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.03.007]
　Shen Nianhua.Interspecific associations of the tree populations of the Quercus variabilis community in Purple Mountain， Nanjing[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2022,49(03):42-47.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.03.007]
点击复制

紫金山栓皮栎群落主要乔木种群的种间联结性()
分享到：

《江苏林业科技》[ISSN:1001-7380/CN:32-1236/S]

卷:
第49卷
期数:
2022年03期
页码:
42-47
栏目:
试验研究
出版日期:
2022-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Interspecific associations of the tree populations of the Quercus variabilis community in Purple Mountain， Nanjing
文章编号:
1001-7380（2022）03-0042-06
作者:
沈年华1; 2
1.江苏联合职业技术学院苏州旅游与财经分院，江苏 苏州 215104；
2.南京林业大学，江苏 南京 210037
Author(s):
Shen Nianhua1; 2
1.Suzhou Tourism and Finance Institute, Jiangsu Union Technical Institute, Suzhou 215104, China；
2. Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
关键词:
栓皮栎; 种群; 种间联结; 紫金山; 南京
Keywords:
Quercus variabilis; Population; Interspecific association; Purple Mountain; Nanjing
分类号:
S718.54；S792.18
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.03.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探寻南京紫金山栓皮栎(Quercus variabilis)群落主要种群的种间联结性，采用方差比法、?i>χ2检验、联结系数（AC）、共同出现百分率（PC）和点相关系数（Φ）对18个乔木种群的种间联结测定与分析。结果表明：栓皮栎群落的总体联结性VR＜1，χ20.9556＜W＜χ20.0556，主要乔木种群总体表现为不显著负联结，各物种趋于独立，群落整体不稳定； χ2检验显示绝大多数（90.20%）的种对间联结不显著，种间联结较弱，群落处于不稳定演替阶段；联结系数AC测定表明大部分（70.59%）种对联结不显著，种间联结较为松散；共同出现百分率PC测定表明种间总体上联结较为松散，种间对生境的需求有所不同，同时出现的概率小；点相关系数Φ测定表明多数（57.52%）种对呈负联结，大部分种对（90.19%）的种间联结程度较弱。
Abstract:
To explore the interspecific association of the main populations of Quercus variabilis community in Purple Mountain, Nanjing, the variance ratio(VR), χ2 test, association coefficient(AC), percentage co-occurrence coefficient(PC) and point correlation coefficient(Φ) were used to analyze and determine the interspecific associations of the 18 main tree populations. The results showed that there was no significant negative correlations among these 18 main tree populations based on VR less than one(χ20.9556＜W＜χ20.0556 ), as the species tended to be distributed independently and the community was unstable. The χ2 test results showed that the majority (accounting for 90.20% of the total logarithm) of species pairs had no significant association, the interspecific association among the species was weak, and the community was in the stage of unstable succession. The determination of AC showed that most species (70.59%) had no significant pair association, and the interspecific association was relatively loose. The determination of PC showed that the interspecific connection was loose，the species generally had different needs for habitat, and the probability of simultaneous occurrence was small. The Φ showed that most species pairs (57.52%) showed negative association, and the interspecific association degree of most species pairs (90.19%) was weak.

参考文献/References:

[1]YANG Q W, LIU S J, HU C H, et al. Ecological species groups and interspecific association of vegetation in natural recovery process at Xiejiadian landslide after 2008 Wenchuan earthquake[J].Journal of Mountain Science,2016,13(9):1609-1620.
[2]LEGENDRE P, LEGENDRE L. Numerical ecology[M].3rd ed.Amsterdam:Elsevier,2012.
[3]陆龙龙,郭忠玲,范春楠,等.吉林磨盘山次生落叶阔叶林群落特征和稳定性分析[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(7):2079-2087.
[4]刘翔宇,何东,田文斌,等.浙江普陀山岛森林木本植物的种间关联格局[J].植物生态学报,2017,41(12):1219-1227.
[5]胡芳.喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林群落稳定性及其影响因素[D].北京:中国科学院大学,2018.
[6]吴迪,湛斌,闫新利,等.紫金山栓皮栎枫香混交林群落结构与物种多样性[J].安徽农业大学学报,2017,44(1):50-54.
[7]沈年华,李传磊,汤庚国.南京紫金山栓皮栎种群动态[J].福建林业科技,2015,42(3):104-106.
[8]袁在翔,金雪梅,马婷瑶,等.南京灵谷寺栓皮栎种群结构与动态[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(6):1488-1494.
[9]张志民.紫金山栓皮栎林水源涵养功能研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2010.
[10]徐小林.栓皮栎群体遗传结构研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2003.
[11]菅瑞,马姜明,莫燕华,等.桂林喀斯特石山檵木群落不同恢复阶段种间联结研究[J].广西植物,2021,41(5):746-757.
[12]叶权平,张文辉,于世川.桥山林区麻栎群落主要乔木种群的种间联结性[J].生态学报,2018,38(9):3165-3174.

相似文献/References:

[1]潘 林,祝亚云蒋泽平*,谢 健,等.添加园林废弃物堆肥基质对栓皮栎容器苗生长的影响[J].江苏林业科技,2018,45(01):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.01.007]
　PAN Lin,ZHU Ya-yun,JIANG Ze-ping*,et al.Effect of green waste compost substrate on containerized Quercus variabilis seedling growth[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2018,45(03):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.01.007]
[2]李冬林,孙戴妍,张存宽,等.南京市溧水区林场锥栗群落特征研究[J].江苏林业科技,2018,45(03):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.03.001]
　Li Donglin,Sun Daiyan,Zhang Cunkuan,et al.Study on population structure of Castanea henryi in Forestry Farm of Lishui District, Nanjing[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2018,45(03):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.03.001]
[3]丁玉华,丁晶晶,李鹏飞,等.中国野生麋鹿种群发展策略探[J].江苏林业科技,2018,45(05):49.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.05.011]
　Ding Yuhua,Ding Jingjing,Li Pengfei,et al.Strategy study of wild Pere David deer( Elaphurus davidianus ) population development in China[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2018,45(03):49.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.05.011]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2022-03-30;修回日期：2022-04-26
基金项目：江苏省教育科学“十三五”规划课题“省级名师工作室引领作用及建设策略研究”（D/2016/03/70）；江苏联合职业技术学院立项课题“五年制高职《园林植物》课程教学资源建设研究”（B/2020/10/079）
作者简介：沈年华（1983- ），男，江苏苏州人，副教授，硕士。主要从事植物生态和植物资源学研究。Tel：13382410309；E-mail：nianhuashen@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-08-08