[1]孙艳芝,张同升,孔含笑,等.不同供给视角下徐州公园绿地社会服务供需关系研究[J].江苏林业科技,2020,47(05):43-49.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.05.010]
 Sun Yanzhi,Zhang Tongsheng,Kong Hanxiao,et al.Supply-demand relation of social services in Xuzhou park greenlands from different supply perspectives[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2020,47(05):43-49.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.05.010]
点击复制

不同供给视角下徐州公园绿地社会服务供需关系研究()
分享到:

《江苏林业科技》[ISSN:1001-7380/CN:32-1236/S]

卷:
第47卷
期数:
2020年05期
页码:
43-49
栏目:
试验研究
出版日期:
2020-10-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Supply-demand relation of social services in Xuzhou park greenlands from different supply perspectives
文章编号:
1001-7380(2020)05-0043-07
作者:
孙艳芝1 张同升1孔含笑2何紫云1
1. 中国城市建设研究院有限公司,北京100120;
2. 青岛高新技术产业开发区管理委员会,山东青岛266111
Author(s):
Sun Yanzhi1Zhang Tongsheng1Kong Hanxiao2He Ziyun1
1.Beijing Urban Construction Co., Ltd., Beijing 100102, China;
2.Qingdao National High-Tech Industrial Development Zone, Qingdao 266111, China
关键词:
公园绿地社会服务可达性供需关系徐州
Keywords:
Urban ParkGreenlandSocial serviceAccessibilitySupply-demand relationXuzhou
分类号:
Q143+.4; S731.2;X173
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.05.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
公园绿地空间布局与结构影响城市社会服务的供需关系,对保障居民休闲游憩需求至关重要。该文以徐州市各城区街道办事处为基本研究单元,采用平均最邻近距离、服务半径等方法,从不同供给视角探究公园绿地社会服务供需关系。结果表明:(1)从人均公园绿地面积供给角度看,公园绿地社会服务供需关系空间分布从中心到外围,呈现“高需低供-低需低供-低需高供”格局,不存在高需高供的街道;从500 m服务半径覆盖率供给角度看,各街道公园绿地服务供需关系从中心到外围,大致呈现“高需高供-高需低供-低需高供-低需低供”的分布格局。(2)公园绿地结构以及空间分布特征,决定了不同视角下供需关系的差异性。徐州人口密集的老城街道社区公园小微绿地的配置建设,使得其在人均公园绿地面积较低的情况下,保障了公园绿地服务覆盖率,提高了居民可达性,满足了休闲游憩需求。
Abstract:
Spatial layout and structure of green space affect the supply and demand of urban social services, which is crucial to guarantee residents’ recreational needs. In this paper, the subdistrict offices in Xuzhou were taken as the basic research unit, using the average nearest neighbor distance methods to explore the relationship between supply and demand of social services in parks from different supply perspectives. The results showed that (1) From the supply perspective of per capita green area, the spatial distribution of social service supply and demand showed a pattern of “high demand and low supply—low demand and low supply—low demand and high supply” from the center to the periphery. Based on the perspective of 500 m service radius coverage, the supply-demand relationship of parks services in each street was roughly from the center to the periphery. The distribution pattern was the“high demand and high supply—high demand and low supply—low demand and high supply—low demand and low supply”. (2) The structure and spatial distribution characteristics of parks determined the difference of supply and demand under different perspectives. The configuration and construction of small and micro green space, in the densely populated community of Xuzhou, ensured the service coverage of parks, improved the accessibility of residents and met the residents’ recreational needs under the condition of low per capita green area.

参考文献/References:

[1]同济大学.城市园林绿地规划[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1982.
[2]吴家骅.景观形态学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1999.
[3]ERKIP F. The distribution of urban public services: the case of parks and recreational services in Ankara[J]. Cities, 1997, 14(8):5597-5599.
[4]JIM C Y, CHEN W Y. Perception and attitude of residents toward urban green spaces in Guangzhou (China)[J]. Environmental Management, 2006, 38(3):338-349.
[5]BOONE C G, BUCKLEY G L, GROVE J M, et al. Parks and people: an environmental justice inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2009, 99(4):767-787.
[6]LEE A C, JORDAN H C, HORSLEY J. Value of urban green spaces in promoting healthy living and wellbeing: prospects for planning[J]. Risk Management & Healthcare Policy, 2015, 8:131-137.
[7]DENNIS M, JAMES P. Evaluating the relative influence on population health of domestic gardens and green space along a rural-urban gradient[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2017, 157:343-351.
[8]张云路,李雄,邵明,等.基于城市绿地系统优化的绿地雨洪管理规划研究——以通辽市为例[J].城市发展研究, 2018(1):97-102.
[9]祝昊冉,冯健.北京城市公园的等级结构及其布局研究[J].城市发展研究, 2008,15(4): 76-83.
[10]刘常富,李小马,韩东.城市公园可达性研究——方法与关键问题[J].生态学报, 2010, 30(19):5381-5390.
[11]BERTRAM C, REHDANZ K. The role of urban green space for human well-being[J]. Ecological Economics, 2015, 120:139-152.
[12]ANGULURI R, NARAYANAN P. Role of green space in urban planning: outlook towards smart cities[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2017, 25:58-65.
[13]毕晨,张金光,吕梦竹,等.城市游憩型公共开放空间服务能力的测度――以南京市中心城区为例[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,43(4):117-124.
[14]王昊.徐州城市建设和管理的实践与探索[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2017.
[15]杨鑫,张琦,吴思琦.特大城市绿地格局多尺度、系统化比较研究——以北京、伦敦、巴黎、纽约为例[J].国际城市规划, 2017, 32(3):83-91.
[16]TALEN E. The social equity of urban service distribution: an exploration of park access in Pueblo, Colorado, and Macon, Georgia[J]. Urban Geography, 1997, 18(6): 521-541.
[17]TALEN E, ANSELIN L. Assessing spatial equity: an evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playground[J]. Environment and Planning, 1998, 30: 593-613.
[18]尹海伟,徐建刚.上海公园空间可达性与公平性分析[J].城市发展研究,2009,16(6):71-76.
[19]肖华斌,袁奇峰,徐会军.基于可达性和服务面积的公园绿地空间分布研究[J].规划师,2009, 25(2):83-88.
[20]陈雯,王远飞.城市公园区位分配公平性评价研究——以上海市外环线以内区域为例[J].安徽师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 32(4):373-377.
[21]李文,张林,李莹.哈尔滨城市公园可达性和服务效率分析[J].中国园林, 2010,26(8): 59-62.
[22]唐子来,顾姝.上海市中心城区公共绿地分布的社会绩效评价:从地域公平到社会公平[J].城市规划学刊,2015(2):48-56.
[23]仇保兴.城市转型与重构进程中的规划调控纲要[J].城市规划, 2012, 36(1):13-21.

相似文献/References:

[1]柳絮飞,闵梦月,罗琚,等.南通市崇山区军山自然保护地与公园景区鸟类群落调查分析[J].江苏林业科技,2020,47(01):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.01.005]
 Liu Xufei,Min Mengyue,Luo Ju,et al.Bird differences between Junshan Nature Reserve and urban parks[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2020,47(05):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.01.005]
[2]严俊.牛首山森林公园森林景观提升初探[J].江苏林业科技,2021,48(02):52.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2021.02.012]
[3]李贝.鸟类友好型动物园的营建——以南京市红山森林动物园为例[J].江苏林业科技,2023,50(05):39.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2023.05.008]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-07-08;修回日期:2020-08-10
基金项目:中国建设科技集团创新基金项目“集团绿色空间规划技术体系研究”(Z2019J01)
作者简介:孙艳芝(1989- ),女,江苏徐州人,工程师,博士。E-mail:sunyz.15b@igsnrr.ac.cn。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-12-09