[1]王伟伟,何旭东,郑纪伟,等.盐碱地柳树生物能源林专用品种的选育[J].江苏林业科技,2018,45(06):1-7.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.06.001]
　Wang Weiwei,He Xudong,Zheng Jiwei,et al.Breeding of special varieties of willow bio-energy forest in saline-alkali soil[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2018,45(06):1-7.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.06.001]
点击复制

盐碱地柳树生物能源林专用品种的选育()
分享到：

《江苏林业科技》[ISSN:1001-7380/CN:32-1236/S]

卷:
第45卷
期数:
2018年06期
页码:
1-7
栏目:
试验研究
出版日期:
2018-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Breeding of special varieties of willow bio-energy forest in saline-alkali soil
文章编号:
1001-7380（2018）06-0001-07
作者:
王伟伟1; 2; 何旭东1; 2; 郑纪伟1; 2; 隋德宗1; 2; 姜开朋1; 2; 王保松1; 2*
1. 江苏省林业科学研究院，江苏南京211153；
2. 江苏省农业种质资源保护与利用平台，江苏南京211153
Author(s):
Wang Weiwei1; 2; He Xudong 1; 2; Zheng Jiwei1; 2; Sui Dezong1; 2; Jiang Kaipeng1; 2; Wang Baodong 1; 2*
1. Jiangsu Academy of Forestry, Nanjing 211153 China;
2. Willow Nursery of the Jiangsu Provincial Platform for Conservation and Utilization of Agricultural Germplasm, Nanjing 211153 China
关键词:
柳树; 良种选育; 生物能源林; 稳定性; 专用品种; 盐碱地
Keywords:
Willow;  Breeding;  Bio-energy forest;  Stablization;  Special variety;  Suline-alk alisoil
分类号:
S722.3+6；S759.4；S792.12
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.06.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
根据江苏沿海盐碱地培育柳树生物能源林的需要，利用前期初选的22个耐盐高生物量灌木柳无性系，通过2 a的田间对比试验，依据各无性系的保存率、生物量、低位发热量及折算成的单位面积标准煤产量，筛选出适合在盐碱地生长的柳树生物能源林专用品种，并在轻度、中度和重度含盐立地进行品种稳定性评价。结果表明：在中等含盐立地生长2 a后，22个灌木柳无性系保存率为27.31%—94.93%，盐害指数为0—86.20%，生物量为8.707—39.507 t/(hm2·a)，低位发热量为12 580—14 641 J/g；筛选出的2521等12个优良无性系，平均生物量为21.151—39.507 t/(hm2·a)，折合标准煤产量为10.280 —17.388 t/(hm2·a)。AMMI模型稳定性分析结果表明，这12个无性系在3种立地的稳定性参数Dg值为0.188—3.360，稳定性顺序为2521＞苏柳1053＞2579＞52-2＞2352＞35-13＞2391＞50-6＞苏柳2345＞2381＞51-5＞51-3。在轻盐立地上栽培的最适品种有51-3，51-5，2381，2521和苏柳1053；在中盐立地上栽培的最适品种有2521，50-6，2391，52-2和2352；在重盐立地上栽培的最适品种有2521，51-5，35-13和50-6，其中2521在3种立地均表现优良；3种立地对柳树无性系的鉴别力以轻盐立地最强，Dj值为4.192，中盐优于重盐立地，Dj值分别为2.516和1.760。
Abstract:
In order to meet the need of breeding willow bio-energy forest in saline-alkali soil in coastal areas of Jiangsu, that 22 salt-tolerant and high biomass shrub willow clones selected in early stage were used. After 2 years, field contrast examination, based on survival rate, biomass and low heat value of clones and conversion of standard coal output per unit area, special varieties of willow bio-energy forest suitable for growing in saline-alkali soil were selected, and the variety stability was evaluated in mild, moderate and severe salt-containing sites. The results indicate that in moderate salt-containing site, the survival rate of 22 shrub willow clones in 2 years was 27.31%—94.93%, salt injury index was 0—86.20%, biomass was 8.707—39.507 t/(hm2·a), low heat value was 12 580—14 641 J/g. Twelve superior clones were selected such as Clone 2 521, with average biomass of 21.151—39.507 t/(hm2·a), equivalent to 10.280 —17.388 t/(hm2·a) standard coal output; The results of analysis of AMMI model's stability showed the stability parameter Dg value of 12 clones in 3 different kinds of sites was 0.188—3.360, the stability order was Clone 2521＞1053＞2579＞52-2＞2352＞35-13＞2391＞50-6＞2345＞2381＞51-5＞51-3, the most suitable varieties for cultivation on mild salt stand were regarded as Clone 51-3,51-5,2381,2521 and Clone 1053, the most suitable varieties for cultivation on moderate salt-containing site were regarded as Clone 2521,50-6,2391,52-2 and 2352, and the most suitable varieties for cultivation on severe salt-containing site were regarded as Clone 2521,51-5,35-13 and 50-6, Clone 2521 had excellent performance in 3 kinds of sites. The mild salt-containing site had the highest discriminability of willow clones, with Dj value of 4.192, moderate salt-containing site was better than severe salt-containing site, with Dj value of 2.516 and 1.760.

参考文献/References:

［1］崔士友,张 蛟,翟彩娇.江苏沿海滩涂快速改良与高效利用研究进展［J］.农学学报,2017,7(3):42-46.
［2］DAS DK,CHATURVEDI OP .Energy dynamics and bioenergy production of Populus deltoides G-3 Marshplantation in eastern India［J］. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2009, 33(1): 144-148.
［3］YEMSHANOV D, MCKENNEY D. Fast-growing poplar plantations as a bioenergy supply source for Canada［J］. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2008, 32 (3): 185-197
［4］白卫国,张玲,翟明普.论我国林业生物质能源林培育与发展［J］.林业资源管理，2007（2）:7-10.
［5］张文辉,何景峰,周赛运.能源柳研究现状与国内引种栽培［J］.生物质化学工程,2006,40(B12):38-45.
［6］施士争,潘明建,王保松,等.培育灌木柳生物质能源林的前景［J］.江苏林业科技,2006, 33(3): 1-5.
［7］涂忠虞.柳树育种与栽培［M］.南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1982.
［8］李洪.杨柳能源林种植密度和轮伐期试验及其燃烧特性分析［D］.北京:中国林业科学研究院,2009.
［9］SUI D Z ,WANG B S , SHI S Z,et al.Change of protein expression during leaves of shrub willow clones in response to salt stress ［J］. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2015, 37(3): 1-15.
［10］施士争,隋德宗,王红玲,等.灌木柳速生无性系的耐盐性选择研究［J］.西北林学院学报，2010，25(4) : 72-77．
［11］隋德宗,王保松,施士争,等.盐胁迫对灌木柳无性系幼苗生长及光合作用的影响［J］.浙江林学院学报，2010，27(1) : 63-68．
［12］隋德宗,王保松,王伟伟.盐胁迫对灌木柳2 个无性系渗透调节物质含量的影响［J］.江苏林业科技,2014,41(6):1-3.
［13］王伟伟,乔志攀,何旭东,等.灌木柳种质资源的耐盐性变异［J］.江苏林业科技,2016,43(6):15-19.
［14］吴为人.对基于AMMI模型的品种稳定性分析方法的一点改进［J］.遗传,2000,22(1):31-32.
［15］杨涛,李加纳,唐章林,等. 三种评价品种稳定性方法的比较［J］.贵州农业科学,2006,34(1):28-31.
［16］CHRISRERSSON L, SENNERHY-FORSSE L.Willow and poplar research and plantations in Sweden today ［J］.Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 1995.
［17］GRANHALL U.Biological fertilization［J］.Biomass and Bioenergy,1994, 6 (1 /2): 81-91.
［18］KOPP R F, WHITE E H, ABRAHAMSON L P, et al.Cutting cycle and spacing effects on biomass productionby a willow clone in New York［J］.Biomass and Bioenergy, 1997 12 (5): 313-319.
［19］ LABRECQUE M, TEODORESCU T I. Field performance andbiomass production of12 willow and poplar clones in short-rotation coppice in southern Quebec(Canada) ［ J］. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2005, 29(7): 1-9.
［20］康树珍,贾黎明,彭祚登,等.燃料能源林树种选育及培育技术研究进展［J］.世界林业研究,2007,20(3):27-33.
［21］MITCHELL C P, STEVENS EA,WATTERS M P. Short-rotation forestry-operations, productivity and costs based on experience gainsin the UK［J］. Forest Ecology andManagement, 1999, 121(1/2): 123-136.
［22］NEUHAUSEN E F,ABRAHAMSON L P, WHITE E H, et al. Northeastenergy perspective:Willow biomass-bioenergy industrial development［R /OL］. Paper to the FirstConference of the Short Rotation Woody Crops Operations Working Group, Paducha, Kentucky, 23-25 September, 1996. http: //www.woodycrops.
org/paducha/neuhauser. htm.l. ［23］陈美玲,上官周平.四种园林植物热值与养分特征［J］.应用生态学报,2008,19(4):747-751.
［24］林益明,林鹏,李振基,等.福建武夷山甜槠群落能量的研究［J］.植物学报,1996,38(12):989-994.
［25］彭培好,王金锡,胡振宇,等.人工桤柏混交林生态系统的能量特征［J］.应用生态学报,1998,9(2):113-118.
［26］LONG F L.Application of calorimetric methods to ecological research［J］.Plant Physiology,1934,9(2): 323-327.
［27］张英楠,芦静,张启昌,等.9个能源柳无性系的生物量、热值和能量现存量［J］.北京林业大学学报,2016,38(9):55-61.
［28］杨涛,李加纳,唐章林,等.三种评价品种稳定性方法的比较［J］.贵州农业科学,2006,34(1):28-31.
［29］KEMPTON R A.The use of biplots in interpreting variety byenvironment interactions［J］.Journal of Agricultural Science,1984,103(1):123-125.
［30］余本勋,张时龙,何友,等.AMMI 模型在水稻品种区域试验中的应用［J］.现代农业科技,2010(2):45-46.
［31］常磊,柴守玺.AMMI模型在旱地春小麦稳定性分析中的应用［J］.生态学报,2006,26(11):3677-3684.
［32］曾献英.AMMI模型在棉花区域试验中的应用［J］.棉花学报,2004, 16(4):233-235.
［33］张锡顺,杨建国,刘旭云,等.双标图在蓖麻区域试验产量分析中的应用［J］.西南农业学报,2007,20(5):917-920.
［34］张体德,郑永战,卫双玲,等.全国芝麻区域试验试验点合理性与代表性的评价［J］.河南农业科学,2004(1):15-17.
［35］宿飞飞,陈伊里,吕典秋,等.用 AMMI 模型分析马铃薯淀粉品质性状的稳定性［J］.东北农业大学学报,2009,40(11):18-22.
［36］董云,王毅,漆燕玲,等.应用 AMMI 模型分析评判甘肃省春油菜区试品种的稳定性和适应性［J］.西北农业学报,2010,19(7):74-78.
［37］孙计平,李雪君,吴照辉,等.应用AMMI模型分析烤烟区试品种稳定性［J］.中国农学通报,2011,27(19):263-267.

相似文献/References:

[1]王红玲,王瑞刚*,施士争*,等.柳林污水处理系统净化效率研究[J].江苏林业科技,2015,42(04):5.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2015.04.002]
　WANG Hong-ling,WANG Rui-gang*,SHI Shi-zheng*,et al.Research on the purification efficiency for artificial wastewater by sewage treatment system of willow[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2015,42(06):5.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2015.04.002]
[2]罗桂杰,刘 旭,金 倩.释放花绒寄甲对柳树光肩星天牛的防治效果[J].江苏林业科技,2016,43(04):14.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.04.004]
　LUO Gui-jie,LIU Xu,JIN Qian.Study on the effect of release of Dastarcus helophoroides to control Anoplophora glabripennis in Suqian[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2016,43(06):14.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.04.004]
[3]周洁,宋雪晴,何旭东,等.柳树 SjMIPS 基因的克隆及其表达分析[J].江苏林业科技,2016,43(06):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.06.001 ]
　ZHOU Jie,SONG Xue-qing,HE Xu-dong,et al.Molecular cloning and expression analysis of MIPS gene from Salix under salt stress[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2016,43(06):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.06.001 ]
[4]王伟伟,姚玲,何开跃,等.不同柳树花粉离体培养及活力测定方法比较研究[J].江苏林业科技,2018,45(04):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.04.001]
　Wang Weiwei,Yao Ling,He Kaiyue,et al.Comparative study on in vitro pollen germination and viability evaluation of different willow species[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2018,45(06):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.04.001]
[5]郭群,董德友,闻朝鲜,等.长江中下游滩地柳树无性系造林对比试验[J].江苏林业科技,2019,46(04):27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2019.04.006]
[6]郑纪伟,施士争,黄瑞芳,等.落羽杉良种选育研究进展[J].江苏林业科技,2019,46(05):54.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2019.05.011]
[7]郑纪伟,教忠意,王保松,等.柳树新品种指纹图谱构建[J].江苏林业科技,2020,47(02):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.02.001]
　Zheng Jiwei,Jiao Zhongyi,Wang Baosong,et al.Construction of fingerprint for new Salix varieties[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2020,47(06):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.02.001]
[8]黄瑞芳,张忠,曹瑶,等.铅胁迫下柳树4个无性系生长和生理特性的变化[J].江苏林业科技,2020,47(02):35.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.02.007]
　Huang Ruifang,Zhang Zhong,Cao Yao,et al.Growth and physiological traits of four Salix clones under lead stress[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2020,47(06):35.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.02.007]
[9]张珏,黄瑞芳,韩杰峰.乔木柳4个无性系耐旱性的初步研究[J].江苏林业科技,2020,47(06):47.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.06.010]
[10]何旭东,郑纪伟,王宇,等.柳树种质核DNA含量的流式测定[J].江苏林业科技,2021,48(01):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2021.01.001]
　He Xudong,Zheng Jiwei,Wang Yu,et al.Evaluation of nuclear DNA content in willow germplasm by flow cytometry[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2021,48(06):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2021.01.001]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2018-11-20;修回日期：2018-11-30
基金项目：江苏省林业科技创新与推广项目“沿海地区高标准农田林网建设关键技术研究与示范”（LYKJ［2018］03）；江苏省科技支撑计划（农业）项目“耐盐高生物量灌木柳新品种选育及高效栽培技术研究”（BE2013449）
作者简介：王伟伟（1986- ），女，河南长垣人，硕士。主要从事植物生理生化的研究。
*通信作者：王保松（1965- ），男，江苏江都人，研究员，大学本科毕业。主要从事林木遗传育种研究。E-mail:baosong66@sohu.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-02-20