[1]林灼镕,杨巧琦,吴天杰,等.基于GIS的太姥山风景区生态敏感性分析[J].江苏林业科技,2022,49(06):38-43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.06.007]
 Lin Zhuorong,Yang Qiaoqi,Wu Tianjie,et al.GIS-based ecological sensitivity analysis of Taimu Mountain Scenic Area[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2022,49(06):38-43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.06.007]
点击复制

基于GIS的太姥山风景区生态敏感性分析()
分享到:

《江苏林业科技》[ISSN:1001-7380/CN:32-1236/S]

卷:
第49卷
期数:
2022年06期
页码:
38-43
栏目:
技术与经验
出版日期:
2022-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
GIS-based ecological sensitivity analysis of Taimu Mountain Scenic Area
文章编号:
1001-7380(2022)06-0038-06
作者:
林灼镕杨巧琦吴天杰刘玲吴小刚*
福建农林大学,福建 福州 350100
Author(s):
Lin ZhuorongYang QiaoqiWu TianjieLiu LingWu Xiaogang*
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350100,China
关键词:
GIS层次分析法生态敏感性太姥山风景区
Keywords:
GISAnalytic hierarchy processEcological sensitivityTaimu MountainScenic area
分类号:
P941.76;P962;Q142;Q948.39.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.06.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
生态敏感性对风景名胜区的保护规划有着重大意义,该文以福建省宁德市福鼎市太姥山风景区作为研究对象,选取海拔、坡度、坡向、水体、土地利用类型、植被覆盖度6个生态因子作为生态敏感性评价指标,将其分为4个评价级别,即不敏感、轻度敏感、中度敏感和高度敏感。利用层次分析法确定权重,通过GIS空间分析技术分析单因子与多因子生态敏感性空间分布。结果表明,太姥山总体生态敏感性程度为高敏感性。高敏感区占总面积的29.40%,中敏感区占总面积的28.32%;低敏感度占总面积的22.65%,分布在景区的西北部;不敏感区占总面积的19.63%,均匀分布在景区。最后结合太姥山景区现状,针对不同敏感区提出相应的建议策略,来推动太姥山生态规划的发展与实践。
Abstract:
Ecological sensitivity is of great significance to the protection planning of scenic spots. In the article, Taimu Mountain Scenic Area in Fuding, Ningde, Fujian Province was taken as the research object, with six ecological factors including elevation, slope, aspect, water body, land use type and vegetation coverage selected for evaluation. The conclusions were determined as non-sensitive, light sensitive, medium sensitive and highly sensitive. Analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the weight, and GIS spatial analysis was used to deal with the spatial distribution map of single and complex factor ecological sensitivity. The results showed that the overall ecological sensitivity of Taimu Mountain was high, with the area involved accounting for 2940% of the total area. And medium sensitivity area for 2832%, low sensitivity area for 2265%, distributed within the northwest, but non-sensitivity area for 1963%, evenly distributed. Finally, in combination with the current situation of the Scenic Area, for different sensitive areas, some suggestions and strategies were proposed for developing the ecological planning and practice of Taimu Mountain.

参考文献/References:

[1]欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国生态环境敏感性及其区域差异规律研究[J].生态学报,2000,20(1):9-12.
[2]吴金华,李纪伟,朱鸿儒.基于ArcGIS区统计的延安市土地生态敏感性评价[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(7):1180-1188.
[3]徐华连,高伟龙,陈思,等.基于GIS的苏南地区城市生态空间划定——以苏州市为例[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(2):614-624.
[4]李建军,苏志珠,王言荣.基于GIS的万荣县生态敏感性评价与区划[J].中国农业资源与区划,2014,35(5):48-54.
[5]朱东国,谢炳庚,陈永林.基于生态敏感性评价的山地旅游城市旅游用地策略——以张家界市为例[J].经济地理,2015,35(6):184-189.
[6]孙才志,杨磊,胡冬玲.基于GIS的下辽河平原地下水生态敏感性评价[J].生态学报,2011,31(24):7428-7440.
[7]刘澜,唐晓岚,熊星,等.基于GIS的苏南乡村自然景观的生态敏感性分析[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,42(4):159-164.
[8]卞莉莉,洪滔,何东进,等.太姥山风景名胜区生态旅游资源模糊综合评判法[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2008,29(1):129-132.
[9]张伟,王家卓,任希岩,等.基于GIS的山地城市生态敏感性分析研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(3):44-47.
[10]国家环境保护总局. 生态功能区划技术暂行规程[S].北京:中国科学院生态环境研究中心,2002.
[11]高炎冰,陶洪波,张玉娇,等.哈尔滨市曙光滨水公园的生态敏感性分析[J].北方园艺,2019(16):90-97.
[12]张蜜,陈存友,胡希军.苍南县玉苍山风景区生态敏感性评价[J].林业资源管理,2019(4):92-100.
[13]黄含吟.基于GIS的惠东县寨场山森林公园生态敏感性分析[D]. 长沙:中南林业科技大学,2016.
[14]林涓涓,潘文斌.基于GIS的流域生态敏感性评价及其区划方法研究[J].安全与环境工程,2005(2):23-26.
[15]汤巧英,戚德辉,宋立旺,等.基于GIS和RS的延河流域植被覆盖度与地形因子的相关性研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(4):198-203.
[16]周晓玉,蔡俊,张文文.基于GIS的国家级生态县的生态敏感性评价——以安徽省霍山县为例[J].云南农业大学学报(社会科学),202115(4):148-155.
[17]鲁敏,穆回港,谭蕾,等.基于GIS的济西国家湿地公园生态敏感性评价[J/OL].中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版),2022,52:1-9[2021-12-05].https://doi.org/10.16441/j.cnki.hdxb.20210306.

相似文献/References:

[1]朱铮宇,范竟成,张铭连.苏州市湿地公园鸟类评估指标研究[J].江苏林业科技,2016,43(04):27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.04.008]
 ZHU Zheng-yu,FAN Jing-cheng,ZHANG Ming-lian.Determination of the relevant environmental assessment indicator by surveying birds gathering in wetland parks within Suzhou Prefecture[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2016,43(06):27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.04.008]
[2]熊修文,周华强.滇中高原华山松人工林健康状况评价[J].江苏林业科技,2019,46(03):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2019.03.001]
[3]孙利强,袁德强,刘子茵,等.郑州市35种冬季观果植物的综合评价[J].江苏林业科技,2020,47(01):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.01.001]
 Sun Liqiang,Yuan Deqiang,Liu Ziyin,et al.Comprehensive evaluation of 35 winter ornamental fruit plants in Zhengzhou[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2020,47(06):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.01.001]
[4]宁春娇,董雨琴,杨喻明,等.福州飞凤山奥体公园绿道景观视觉评价研究[J].江苏林业科技,2022,49(05):9.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.05.003]
 Ning Chunjiao,Dong Yuqin,Yang Yuming,et al.Visual evaluation of greenway landscape in Feifeng Mountain Olympic Sports Park in Fuzhou[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2022,49(06):9.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.05.003]
[5]宗树斌,王裕婷,陈少卿,等.小盆栽月季品种生长及观赏性状的观测比较[J].江苏林业科技,2022,49(06):7.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.06.002]
 Zong Shubin,Wang Yuting,Chen Shaoqing,et al.Observation and comparison of growth and ornamental characters of several varieties of mini-flora rose[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2022,49(06):7.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.06.002]
[6]范祝连,万松,邓双,等.基于GIS的山地丘陵城市生态敏感性分析——以福建省泉州市为例[J].江苏林业科技,2022,49(04):12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.04.003]
 Fan Zhulian,Wan Song,Deng Shuang,et al.GIS based ecological sensitivity analysis of mountainous and hilly cities—Taking Quanzhou City, Fujian Province as an example[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2022,49(06):12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.04.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-08-20;修回日期:2022-09-27
基金项目:福建省科技创新领军人才项目(118/KRC16006A)
作者简介:林灼镕(1997- ),女,福建福州人,硕士研究生。主要研究方向为园林与景观设计。E-mail:961096293@qq.com
*通信作者:吴小刚(1965- ),福建建阳人,副教授,硕士生导师。主要从事风景园林规划与设计研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-04-04