[1]范祝连,万松,邓双,等.基于GIS的山地丘陵城市生态敏感性分析——以福建省泉州市为例[J].江苏林业科技,2022,49(04):12-18.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.04.003]
　Fan Zhulian,Wan Song,Deng Shuang,et al.GIS based ecological sensitivity analysis of mountainous and hilly cities—Taking Quanzhou City, Fujian Province as an example[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2022,49(04):12-18.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.04.003]
点击复制

基于GIS的山地丘陵城市生态敏感性分析——以福建省泉州市为例()
分享到：

《江苏林业科技》[ISSN:1001-7380/CN:32-1236/S]

卷:
第49卷
期数:
2022年04期
页码:
12-18
栏目:
试验研究
出版日期:
2022-08-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
GIS based ecological sensitivity analysis of mountainous and hilly cities—Taking Quanzhou City, Fujian Province as an example
文章编号:
1001-7380（2022）04-0012-07
作者:
范祝连1; 万松1; 邓双1; 卞阿娜1; 2*
1.福建农林大学风景园林与艺术学院，福建 福州 350002；
2.闽南师范大学生物科学与技术学院，福建 漳州 363000
Author(s):
Fan Zhulian1; Wan Song1; Deng Shuang1; Bian A’na1; 2*
1.College of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
2. School of Biological Science and Technology, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou 363000, China
关键词:
生态敏感性; GIS; 层次分析法; 山地丘陵; 城市; 泉州市
Keywords:
Ecological sensitivity; GIS; Analytic hierarchy process; Mountains and hills; City; Quanzhou City
分类号:
P941.76；P962；Q142；Q948.39.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.04.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
生态敏感性分析是城市规划布局的重要依据。该文以山地丘陵城市泉州市为研究对象，选取坡度、坡向、高程、土地利用类型、植物覆盖度、河流水体、人口密度、文物保护单位、道路交通等9个指标作为评价要素，采用层次分析法（AHP）确定各指标权重，将生态敏感程度分为极敏感、高度敏感、中度敏感、轻度敏感和不敏感5个级别，并运用Arc GIS技术对泉州市生态敏感性进行评价。结果表明：研究区生态敏感性适中，道路交通、人口密度、高程和植物覆盖度是其主要敏感因子，其极敏感区、高度敏感区、中度敏感区、轻度敏感区和不敏感区占研究区域总面积的比例分别为7.70%，16.01%，32.64%，33.45%和10.20%。该研究结果可为泉州市的开发建设和规划提供依据及参考。
Abstract:
Ecological sensitivity analysis is an important basis for urban planning and layout. Taking Quanzhou City, a mountainous and hilly city, as the research object, according to the characteristics of Quanzhou City, nine indicators, including slope degree, slope direction, elevation, land use type, plant coverage, river water body, population density, cultural relics protection units and road traffic were selected evaluation elements. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to determine the weight of each indicator. According to the level of ecological sensitivity, the study was divided into five levels: extremely sensitive, highly sensitive, moderately sensitive, slightly sensitive and insensitive. GIS technology was used to evaluate the ecological sensitivity of Quanzhou City. The results showed that the ecological sensitivity of the study area was moderate, with 4 main sensitive factors, which were road traffic, population density, elevation and vegetation cover. The proportions of extremely sensitive area, highly sensitive area, moderately sensitive area, slightly sensitive area and insensitive area were 7.70%, 16.01%, 32.64%, 33.45% and 10.20% of the total area of the study area respectively. The research results could be used as a basis and reference for the development, construction and planning of Quanzhou City.

参考文献/References:

[1]欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国生态环境敏感性及其区域差异规律研究[J].生态学报,2000,20(1):9-12.
[2]韩贵锋,赵珂,袁兴中,等.基于空间分析的山地生态敏感性评价——以四川省万源市为例[J].山地学报,2008,26(5):531-537.
[3]张磊,刘利强,胡海波,等.基于区域开发的钦州市生态敏感性分析及防控对策[J].生态与农村环境学报,2009,25(3):16-20.
[4]叶其炎,杨树华,陆树刚,等.玉溪地区生物多样性及生境敏感性分析[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(6):75-78.
[5]CARIBONI J, GATELLI D, LISKA R, et al. The role of sensitivity analysis in ecological Modelling[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2007,203(1-2):167-182.
[6]罗鹏,石军南,孙华.基于GIS空间模型的库区生态敏感性评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(2):255-258.
[7]张蜜,陈存友,胡希军.苍南县玉苍山风景区生态敏感性评价[J].林业资源管理,2019(4):92-100,150.
[8]杨美玲,米文宝,李同昇,等.宁夏限制开发生态区生态敏感性综合评价与保护对策[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(3):103-108,321.
[9]何苏玲,邹凤琼,王金亮.基于AHP和MSE赋权法的龙南县生态敏感性评价[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(9):2927-2935.
[10]李怡,赵小敏,郭熙,等.江西省南昌市生态敏感性空间分异研究[J].中国农业大学学报,2020,25(10):65-76.
[11]SAFEEQ M, GRANT G E, LEWIS S L, et al. Predicting landscape sensitivity to present and future floods in the Pacific Northwest, USA[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2015, 29(26): 5337-5353.
[12]李振亚,魏伟,周亮,等.中国陆地生态敏感性时空演变特征[J].地理学报,2022,77(1):150-163.
[13]刘康,欧阳志云,王效科,等.甘肃省生态环境敏感性评价及其空间分布[J].生态学报,2003,23(12):2711-2718.
[14]黄发明,杨光照,苏晨旭,等.基于GIS和层次分析法的县域生态敏感性评价[J].南昌大学学报(理科版),2019,43(6):599-605.
[15]周雨露,杨永峰,袁伟影,等. 基于GIS的济南小清河流域生态敏感性分析与评价[J].西北林学院学报,2016,31(3):50-56,62.
[16]曹建军,刘永娟.GIS支持下上海城市生态敏感性分析[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(7):1805-1812.
[17]鲁敏,穆回港,谭蕾,等. 基于GIS的济西国家湿地公园生态敏感性评价[J/OL].中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版):1-9[2022-06-10].
[18]宋晓龙,李晓文,白军红,等.黄河三角洲国家级自然保护区生态敏感性评价[J].生态学报,2009,29(9):4836-4846.
[19]THOMAS M F. Landscape sensitivity to rapid environmental change—a Quaternary perspective with examples from tropical areas[J]. Catena, 2004, 55(2): 107-124.
[20]彭春花,周启刚,孟浩斌,等. 基于LECI的三峡库区重庆段景观生态敏感性分析及关键修复区识别[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(3):325-330,339.
[21]MILES J，CUMMINS R P, FRENCH D D, et al. Landscape sensitivity: an ecological view[J]. Catena,2001,42(2-4):125-141.
[22]易玲.中国水力侵蚀风险研究[D].北京:中国科学院大学(中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所),2017.
[23]国家环境保护总局.生态功能区划技术暂行规程[S].北京:中国科学院生态环境研究中心,2002.
[24]赵可极.基于生态敏感性分析的山地旅游景区生态规划设计研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学,2019.
[25]翟端强,叶强,何玮琪.湖南丘陵城市土地生态敏感性评价及景观生态格局优化研究[J].中国园林,2019,35(1):133-138.
[26]张伟,王家卓,任希岩,等.基于GIS的山地城市生态敏感性分析研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(3):44-47,54.
[27]赖玉萍,郑林.基于GIS的赣南丘陵地区生态敏感性研究——以赣县河埠村为例[J].农村经济与科技,2021,32(13):10-13.
[28]丁鸿浩,赖宁静,邓林昊,等.基于AHP-TOPSIS最优组合赋权的闽侯县生态敏感性评价[J].中国城市林业,2022,20(3):94-101.

相似文献/References:

[1]宁春娇,董雨琴,杨喻明,等.福州飞凤山奥体公园绿道景观视觉评价研究[J].江苏林业科技,2022,49(05):9.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.05.003]
　Ning Chunjiao,Dong Yuqin,Yang Yuming,et al.Visual evaluation of greenway landscape in Feifeng Mountain Olympic Sports Park in Fuzhou[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2022,49(04):9.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.05.003]
[2]林灼镕,杨巧琦,吴天杰,等.基于GIS的太姥山风景区生态敏感性分析[J].江苏林业科技,2022,49(06):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.06.007]
　Lin Zhuorong,Yang Qiaoqi,Wu Tianjie,et al.GIS-based ecological sensitivity analysis of Taimu Mountain Scenic Area[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2022,49(04):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.06.007]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2022-05-27;修回日期：2022-06-23
基金项目：漳州市规划院委托项目“高新区土地综合整治与生态修复”（A92028）
作者简介：范祝连(1997- )，女，福建龙岩人，硕士研究生。主要从事园林与景观设计研究。
*通信作者：卞阿娜(1977- )，女，福建漳州人，副教授，硕士生导师。主要从事风景园林规划与设计研究。 E-mail:ban2@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-10-19