[1]陈智龙,李承康,宁春娇,等.冠顶式步道对游客生理心理健康影响研究[J].江苏林业科技,2021,48(04):16-23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2021.04.004]
　Chen Zhilong,Li Chengkang,Ning Chunjiao,et al.Effect of treetop walk on physical and mental health of tourists[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2021,48(04):16-23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2021.04.004]
点击复制

冠顶式步道对游客生理心理健康影响研究()
分享到：

《江苏林业科技》[ISSN:1001-7380/CN:32-1236/S]

卷:
第48卷
期数:
2021年04期
页码:
16-23
栏目:
试验研究
出版日期:
2021-08-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of treetop walk on physical and mental health of tourists
文章编号:
1001-7380（2021）04-0016-08
作者:
陈智龙; 李承康; 宁春娇; 黄启堂*
福建农林大学园林学院，福建 福州 350002
Author(s):
Chen Zhilong; Li Chengkang; Ning Chunjiao; Huang Qitang*
College of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
关键词:
恢复性环境; 冠顶式步道; 空间景观类型; 健康; 绿视率
Keywords:
Restorative environment; Treetop walk; Space type; Health; Green vision rate
分类号:
S718.53；S731.3；X171.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2021.04.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探究冠顶式步道中不同空间景观视觉对游客生理及心理感知的影响，该研究以福州市福道与金鸡山公园步道为例，对其空间环境进行拍摄取样，挑选40名被试者通过心理恢复性问卷，并结合ErgoLab多导仪器进行体验监测，即采集人体皮电活动（EDA）以及心率变异性（HRV）等生理波动数据赋值，运用绿视率、自然程度、物种丰富度、喜好度4个维度进行景观特征评价，及运用“远离”“延展”“迷人”和“相容”4类维度进行恢复性感知的环境评价。结果表明：6类冠顶式步道空间恢复性效应的大小顺序依次为：冠顶式步道近景高绿视率空间>冠顶式步道近景中绿视率空间>冠顶式步道远景中绿视率空间>冠顶式步道远景高绿视率空间>冠顶式步道远景低绿视率空间>冠顶式步道近景低绿视率空间；冠顶式步道景观游客心理健康恢复效果越好，则对其环境偏好就越高；冠顶式步道6类空间能够对被试者的生理健康产生良好的恢复性影响，但各类空间相互间的恢复性比较并无显著差异。
Abstract:
After the space with relevant environmental characteristics of the treetop walk in Fuzhou City was sampled, and the representative real space images selected, the virtual space scenes with different spatial characteristics were established. Fourty subjects were selected to enter in the environment simulation experiment in the form of psychological restorative evaluation questionnaire and by obtaining physiological data such as electrodermal activity (EDA), heart rate variablity (HRV) , then the scores of restorative evaluation were collected to show the differences among different spaces of treetop walk as well as their psychological perception. In terms of 3 indicators of green vision rate, degree of nature and species richness, the spatial characteristics of treetop walk with good restorative effect were screened out, and the relationship between environmental preference and mental health perception was also analyzed. The results showed that the mental health recovery of people in close range with high green vision space was significantly higher than that in other types of space. And from the analysis of environmental indicators, we found that the higher the degree of nature, the higher the species richness, and the higher the green vision rate, the more favorable mental health the tourists obtained. There also was a significant correlation between environmental preference and perception resilience.

参考文献/References:

[1]FREEDMAN G. Salcey tree top walk[J]. Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-Engineering sustainability,2009,162(4):23-28.
[2]SCHWARZER M. The tree canopy as blueprint[J]. Architectural Design,2010,80(3):20-27.
[3]黄延峰.福州“福道”森林步行道设计[J].景观设计学,2018,6(6):66-73,66.
[4]曾真,朱南燕,王丹,等.基于游客游憩动机及行为特征下的城市绿道优化策略研究——以福州市福道为例[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,49(4):639-645.
[5]林月彬,刘健,余坤勇,等.冠顶式步道景观环境感知评价研究——以福州“福道”为例[J].中国园林,2019,35(6):72-77.
[6]高仰驰,余坤勇,刘艳芬, 等.冠顶式步道秋季微气候效应研究——以福州“福道”为例[J].西北林学院学报,2021,36(1):266-272.
[7]陈荣义,韩百川,林烽,等.森林公园环境质量与恢复性知觉关系[J].中国城市林业,2021,19(3):85-89.
[8]刘雪鸣.基于摄像法的街道环境主观恢复性效益影响因素研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2019.
[9]LANGE C G. The Emotions: A psychophysiological study[M]. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins,1992.
[10]MYERS D G. Exploring psychology[M].第5版. New York, US: Worth Publishers, 2009.
[11]EEROLA T, VUOSKOSKI J K. A review of music and emotion studies: Approaches, emotion models and stimuli[J]. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30(3):307-340.
[12]KAPLAN R, KAPLAN S. Preference, restoration, and meaningful action in the context of nearby nature[M]∥ BARLETT P F. Urban Place: Reconnecting with the Natural World. MA, Cambridge, MIT Press, 2005： 271-298.
[13]翁羽西,朱玉洁,董嘉莹,等.校园绿地声景观对情绪和注意力的影响——以福建农林大学为例[J].中国园林,2021,37(2):88-93.
[14]朱晓玥. 蓝绿空间类型及特征对压力恢复的影响研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2019.
[15]GRAHN P. Landscape planning and stress[J].Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2003, 2(1): 1-18.
[16]陈晓,王博,张豹.远离“城嚣”:自然对人的积极作用、理论及其应用[J].心理科学进展,2016,24(2):270-281.
[17]李驰.状态焦虑对持续性注意控制的影响：自我损耗程度的调节作用[D]. 北京:北京体育大学,2017.
[18]龚然,陈听,张力为.观看自然环境图片对自我损耗条件下认知与运动自我控制的影响[J].心理科学,2020,43(4):793-800.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2021-05-30;修回日期：2021-06-24
基金项目：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“新数据环境下浙闽地区山水人居环境地域景观保护与发展研究”（20YJC760079）
作者简介：陈智龙（1997- ），男，福建龙岩人，硕士研究生。主要从事风景园林规划与设计研究。
*通信作者：黄启堂（1963- ），男，福建尤溪人，教授，硕士生导师。主要从事风景园林规划与设计研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-10-14