[1]陈 于,王 敏,朱灿灿,等.常州金坛地区不同薄壳山核桃品种黑斑病抗性田间调查[J].江苏林业科技,2018,45(06):26-29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.06.007]
 Chen Yu,Wang Min,Zhu Cancan,et al.Field investigation of resistance against black spot of different pecan varieties in Jintan, Changzhou[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2018,45(06):26-29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.06.007]
点击复制

常州金坛地区不同薄壳山核桃品种黑斑病抗性田间调查()
分享到:

《江苏林业科技》[ISSN:1001-7380/CN:32-1236/S]

卷:
第45卷
期数:
2018年06期
页码:
26-29
栏目:
试验研究
出版日期:
2018-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Field investigation of resistance against black spot of different pecan varieties in Jintan, Changzhou
文章编号:
1001-7380(2018)06-0026-04
作者:
陈 于1王 敏1朱灿灿1赵玉强1王宝新2马 襄3耿国民1
1. 江苏省中国科学院植物研究所(南京中山植物园), 江苏 南京 210014;
2. 常州市金坛茅山景区资产经营有限公司, 江苏 常州 213200;
3. 江苏省常州市金坛区林业站, 江苏 常州 213022
Author(s):
Chen Yu1 Wang Min1 Zhu Cancan1 Zhao Yuqiang1 Wang Baoxin2 Ma Xiang3 Geng Guoming1
1. Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China;
2. Asset Management Co. Ltd, of Maoshan Scenic Area, Jintan, Changzhou 213200, China;
3. Jintan Forestry Station, Changzhou 213022, China
关键词:
薄壳山核桃黑斑病发病率 发病指数果实形状常州
Keywords:
Pecan Black spot Incidence Disease index Fruit shape Changzhou
分类号:
S436.64;S664.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.06.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
2018年8月在江苏省常州市金坛区薄壳山核桃种植园资源圃,调查了11个薄壳山核桃主要推广栽培品种果实黑斑病发病情况。结果显示,不同薄壳山核桃品种的发病率和病情指数存在着显著性差异,发病率和病情指数的大小依次为无性系3>马汉>无性系4>无性系2>无性系5>绍兴>坎扎>金华>无性系6>波尼>无性系1;薄壳山核桃的黑斑病发生与果实形状有一定的相关性,发病率和发病指数与果实长度成正相关,与果实宽度成一定负相关。
Abstract:
Black spot disease occurrence of total 11 pecan varieties was investigated in plantation of Jintan, Changzhou in August 2018. The results indicated that there were significant differences in the incidence and index, with such an order as Clone 3>Mahan>Clone 4>Clone 2>Clone 5>Shaoxing>Kanza>Jinhua>Clone 6>Pawnee>Clone 1. At the same time, it was found that there was a certain correlation between the occurrence of black spot disease and fruit shape, which was, in detail, the incidence and disease index were positively correlated with fruit length and negatively correlated with fruit width.

参考文献/References:

[1]何海洋, 彭方仁, 李小飞, 等. 薄壳山核桃果园虫害调查分析 [J]. 江苏林业科技, 2015, 42(2):10-14.
[2]姚小华, 常君, 王开良. 中国薄壳山核桃[M]. 北京科学出版社, 2014.
[3]董凤祥,王贵禧. 美国薄壳山核桃引种及栽培技术[M].北京:金盾出版社,2003.
[4]戚钱钱, 陈秀龙, 时浩杰, 等. 薄壳山核桃病虫害调查及主要病虫害防治关键技术 [J]. 中国森林病虫, 2016, 35(2):30-33.
[5]张传清, 徐志宏, 孙品雷, 等. 新病害——山核桃果实黑斑病病原菌的鉴定[J]. 植物保护,2010,36(4):160-162.
[6]SHI H J, ZHANG C Q, SHAN L Y, et al. First report of Pestalo-tiopsis microspora as a causal agent of black spot of pecan(Carya illinoensis) in China[J]. Plant Disease,2015,9( 9) :1276.
[7]杨莉, 李丕军, 朱莲,等. 核桃不同品种对褐斑病抗性调查及化学防治药剂的筛选[J].中国森林病虫,2018 ,27(4):39-42.
[8]习学良,范志远, 邹伟烈,等.10个美国山核桃品种的引种研究初报[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2006, 23(4):382-387.
[9]巨云为,赵盼盼,黄 麟,等.薄壳山核桃主要病害发生规律及防控[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(4):31-36.
[10]彭方仁,李永荣,郝明灼,等.我国薄壳山核桃生产现状与产业化发展策略[J]. 林业工程学报, 2012, 26(4):1-4.
[11]覃文榜,覃文更.环江县美国山核桃主要病虫害调查及其防治技术[J].黑龙江农业科学, 2016(4):165-166.

相似文献/References:

[1]何海洋,彭方仁*,李小飞,等.薄壳山核桃果园虫害调查分析[J].江苏林业科技,2015,42(02):10.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2015.02.003]
 HE Hai-yang,PENG Fang-ren*,LI Xiao-fei,et al.Investigation on pest damage of Carya illinoensis orchard[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2015,42(06):10.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2015.02.003]
[2]吕运舟,窦全琴,蒋泽平.薄壳山核桃愈伤组织诱导的影响因素[J].江苏林业科技,2015,42(05):29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2015.05.009]
 LYU Yun-zhou,DOU Quan-qin,JIANG Ze-ping.Impact factors of the callus inducement and growth of Carya illinoensis in vitro culture[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2015,42(06):29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2015.05.009]
[3]张 斌,王晓丽,陈 婷,等.薄壳山核桃砧木不同处理对嫁接苗生长的影响[J].江苏林业科技,2016,43(03):25.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.03.007]
 ZHANG Bin,WANG Xiao-li,CHEN Ting,et al.Trial of Carya illinoensis rind grafting in the field with different rootstock treatment[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2016,43(06):25.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.03.007]
[4]陈文霞,吴文浩,彭方仁.江苏丘陵地区薄壳山核桃适宜栽培模式及其产业发展对策[J].江苏林业科技,2016,43(03):53.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.03.014]
[5]吕运舟,董筱昀,黄利斌,等.‘波尼’等5个薄壳山核桃品种生长及早期结实特性比较[J].江苏林业科技,2017,44(06):10.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2017.06.003]
 LYU Yun-zhou,DONG Xiao-yun,HUANG Li-bin,et al.Comparison of fruiting characteristics of five Carya illionoensis cultivars[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2017,44(06):10.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2017.06.003]
[6]仲磊,董筱昀.江苏薄壳山核桃和油用牡丹发展现状与对策[J].江苏林业科技,2018,45(03):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.03.012]
[7]朱苏堂,李春,焦佃进,等.侧枝下月牙形剥皮对薄壳山核桃生长量及产量的影响[J].江苏林业科技,2019,46(06):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2019.06.008]
[8]吕运舟,施士争,吴静*.不同间种模式对白茶春梢叶色参数与色素含量的影响[J].江苏林业科技,2020,47(04):13.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.04.003]
 Lyu Yunzhou,Shi Shizheng,Wu Jing*.Effects of different agroforestry system on leaf color parameters and pigment content of spring tip of White tea[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2020,47(06):13.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.04.003]
[9]孙迎辉,郑华英*,解春霞,等.利用天敌昆虫防治薄壳山核桃天牛试验初探[J].江苏林业科技,2020,47(04):22.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.04.005]
[10]吕运舟,黄利斌,何雅萍.短截对不同薄壳山核桃品种新发枝的影响[J].江苏林业科技,2021,48(03):5.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2021.03.002]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-12-03;修回日期:2018-12-17
基金项目:江苏省科技基础设施建设项目(BM2015019);江苏省植物资源研究与利用重点实验室(江苏省中国科学院植物研究所)项目“薄壳山核桃遗传图谱的构建”(JSPKLB201604);江苏省林业科技创新与推广项目“薄壳山核桃高效栽培及复合套种技术研究与示范”(LYKJ[2017]38)子项目“薄壳山核桃水肥一体化栽培技术与示范”
作者简介:陈 于(1986- ),男,安徽阜阳人,助理研究员,博士。主要从事薄壳山核桃病虫害研究。E-mail:15150530195@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-02-20