[1]徐肇友,陈焕伟,楚秀丽*,等.红豆树截干时间和截干高度对穗条生长的影响[J].江苏林业科技,2017,44(04):13-17.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2017.04.003]
　XU Zhao-you,CHEN Huan-wei,CHU Xiu-li*,et al.Effect of cutting time and height on sprout growth of Ormosia hosiei[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2017,44(04):13-17.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2017.04.003]
点击复制

红豆树截干时间和截干高度对穗条生长的影响()
分享到：

《江苏林业科技》[ISSN:1001-7380/CN:32-1236/S]

卷:
第44卷
期数:
2017年04期
页码:
13-17
栏目:
试验研究
出版日期:
2017-08-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of cutting time and height on sprout growth of Ormosia hosiei
文章编号:
1001-7380（2017）04-0013-05
作者:
徐肇友1; 陈焕伟1; 楚秀丽2*; 肖纪军1; 周志春2
1. 龙泉市林业科学研究院，浙江 龙泉 323700；
2. 中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业研究所 浙江省林木育种技术研究重点实验室， 浙江 富阳 311400
Author(s):
XU Zhao-you1;  CHEN Huan-wei1;  CHU Xiu-li2*;  XIAO Ji-jun1;  ZHOU Zhi-chun2
1. Forestry Academy of Longquan City, Zhejiang Province, Longquan 323700, China;
2. Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding, CAF, Fuyang 311400, China
关键词:
红豆树; 截干时间; 截干高度; 穗条
Keywords:
Ormosia hosiei;  Stem cutting time;  Cutting height;  Sprout
分类号:
S722.8+1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2017.04.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
对红豆树2年生容器苗进行截干促萌试验，分析截干时间和截干高度对穗条生长的影响。结果表明：截干时间明显影响穗条长度和穗条直径。相对3月而言，11月和1月截干的植株穗条较长，直径明显较粗，2者对应长度和直径分别为44.79，44.28 cm和6.91，6.75 cm，均高出3月对应指标15%，且此2时间节点的穗条性状不存在明显差异；截干高度对穗条长度的影响亦较为显著，截干高度15 cm植株穗条最长，达44.58 cm，与截干高度5 cm处理所致穗条长度间差异不显著，但显著长于截干高度30 cm的植株穗条。不同截干时间节点的截干高度对穗条生长的影响不一致，11月和1月，截干高度为15，30 cm的植株，萌发穗条数量显著多于截干高度为5 cm 的植株；3月，则表现出截干高度愈高穗条长度愈长的现象。因此，在树液流动前，对红豆树进行截干较为理想；15 cm是较理想的截干高度，截干高度较高，对获得穗条数量影响不大。
Abstract:
To get agamogenesis material of Ormosia hosiei, the trial of new shoot promotion after stem-cutting-off was carried out with the 2-year-old container seedlings, to analyze effect of the stem cutting time and cutting height on the growth of the sprout shoot. The cutting time significantly affected the sprout length and basal diameter. Compared with that in March, the shoots got from cutting in January and November were longer, and their diameters of the base were larger, (44.79, 44.28 cm and 6.91, 6.75 cm), more than 15% larger than that in March, with no significant difference in the sprouting characteristics between in January and November of the year. The effect of cutting height on the length of the sprout was also obvious, and sprout length for the cutting height of 15 cm was the longest, reaching 44.58 cm, no noticeable difference between that of the cutting height at 15 cm and 5 cm, while significantly higher than that of the cutting height at 30 cm. Cutting height in different cutting time displayed different effect on the growth of the sprout. In November and January, the stem cutting at height of 15 and 30 cm branched out more sprouts than that of stem cutting at height of 5 cm while in March, the higher the cutting height was, the longer the sprout was. Therefore, before the sapflow it was a better time for stem-cutting, and 15 cm was adaptable stem height, higher cutting height for more sprout was of little significance.

参考文献/References:

［1］金国庆, 秦国峰, 储德裕, 等. 杂种马褂木扦插繁殖技术的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2006, 19(3): 370-375.
［2］陈广辉, 王军辉, 张守攻, 等. 世界云杉采穗圃研究现状及研究重点[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 38(4): 650-653.
［3］金江群, 郭泉水, 朱 莉, 等. 中国特有濒危植物崖柏扦插繁殖研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2013, 26(1): 94-100.
［4］胡勐鸿, 欧阳芳群, 贾子瑞, 等. 欧洲云杉扦插生根影响因子研究与生根力优良单株选择[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(2): 42-49.
［5］王帮顺, 何必庭, 陈杏林, 等. 红豆树根插育苗技术[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2015, 35(5): 65-68.
［6］马常耕. 无性系林业和无性系育种[J]. 湖南林业科技, 1986, (4): 2-3.
［7］KOSSUTH S V. Induction of fascicular bud development in Pinus sylvestris L.[J]. Hort Science,1978, 13(2): 174-176.
［8］罗建勋. 英国西加云杉和落叶松的无性繁殖[J]. 世界林业研究, 1997, 317(3):60-65.
［9］来 端. 火炬松、湿地松和马尾松采穗圃营建技术[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2001, 21(2): 165-168.
［10］HOLMSTR M E, HJELM K, JOHANSSON U, et al. Pre-commercial thinning, birch admixture and sprout management in planted Norway spruce stands in South Sweden[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2016, 31(1):56-65.
［11］吴幸连. 不同密度、截干高和基肥对桉树采穗圃插穗产量的影响[J]. 桉树科技, 2008, 25(2): 12-15.
［12］O’HARA K L, YORK R A, HEALD R C. Effect of pruning severity and timing of treatment on epicormic sprout development in giant sequoia[J]. Forestry, 2008, 81(1): 103-110.
［13］LIU Z L, FANG S Z, LIU D, et al. Influence of thinning time and density on sprout development, biomass production and energy stocks of sawtooth oak stumps[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2011, 262(2): 299-306.
［14］朱万泽, 王金锡, 罗成荣, 等. 森林萌生更新研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2007, 43(9): 74-82.
［15］WU L, SHINZATO T, NISHIHATA O, et al. Characteristics of sprout natural regeneration of evergreen broad-leaved forest dominated by Castanopsis sieboldii in Okinawa: (I). Studies on mortality and decay of stumps[J]. Science Bulletin of the College of Agriculture-University of Ryukyus (Japan), 2000, 47:145-157.
［16］Mc CARTHY R, EK P M K, RYTTER L K. Reliability of stump sprouting as a regeneration method for poplars: clonal behavior in survival, sprout straightness and growth[J]. Silva Fennica, 2014, 48(3): 1-9.
［17］KEYSER T L, ZARNOCH S J.Stump sprout dynamics in response to reductions in stand density for nine upland hardwood species in the southern Appalachian Mountains[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014, 319(5): 29-35.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2017-03-30;修回日期：2017-06-27
基金项目：中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目“红豆树优良株系选育和组培繁育技术研究”（RISF2013009）；浙江省省院合作林业科技项目“红豆树和楠木类等珍贵树种种质选育和种苗高效繁育技术研究”（2017sy19）
作者简介：徐肇友(1976- )，男，浙江龙泉人，工程师，大学本科毕业。主要从事林木良种和种苗繁育工作。547294401@qq.com。
*通信作者：楚秀丽（1981- ），女，河南商丘人，助理研究员，硕士研究生。从事珍贵树种高效培育等研究。xiulic0207@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-11-21