[1]罗红雨,陆皓茜*,施林林,等.园林土壤中氯氰菊酯残留量测定的不确定度评定分析[J].江苏林业科技,2024,51(01):11-16.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2024.01.003]
　Luo Hongyu,Lu Haoqian*,Shi Linlin,et al.Uncertainty evaluation for the determination of cypermethrin residue in landscape soil[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2024,51(01):11-16.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2024.01.003]
点击复制

园林土壤中氯氰菊酯残留量测定的不确定度评定分析()
分享到：

《江苏林业科技》[ISSN:1001-7380/CN:32-1236/S]

卷:
第51卷
期数:
2024年01期
页码:
11-16
栏目:
试验研究
出版日期:
2024-03-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Uncertainty evaluation for the determination of cypermethrin residue in landscape soil
文章编号:
1001-7380（2024）01-0011-06
作者:
罗红雨1; 陆皓茜2*; 施林林2; 周锋杰3
1. 苏州市留园管理处，江苏 苏州 215006；
2. 江苏太湖地区农业科学研究所，江苏 苏州 215106；
3.苏州市农产品质量安全监测中心，江苏 苏州 215128
Author(s):
Luo Hongyu1;  Lu Haoqian2*;  Shi Linlin2;  Zhou Fengjie3
1. Suzhou Liuyuan Management Office, Suzhou 215006, China;
2. Jiangsu Taihu Area Institute of Agricultural Sciences,Suzhou 215106, China;
3. Suzhou Agricultural Products Safety and Quality Inspection Center, Suzhou 215128, China
关键词:
气相色谱法; 园林土壤; 氯氰菊酯; 不确定度; 分析
Keywords:
Gas chromatography;  Landscape soil;  Cypermethrin;  Uncertainty;  Analysis
分类号:
S481+.8
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2024.01.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
不确定度评定分析对于检测方法的改进和定量评价检测结果的质量具有重要意义。采用分散固相萃取-气相色谱法测定园林土壤中氯氰菊酯的残留量，对测定过程中产生不确定度的主要来源进行分析，包括样品重复测量、标准溶液配制、标准曲线拟合、样品称量和前处理、回收率和气相色谱仪测定，并对各分量进行量化、合成与扩展。结果显示，氯氰菊酯农药在0.10 mg/kg添加水平下，各分量的相对标准不确定度分别为7.03×10-3，3.00×10-2，1.63×10-2，8.17×10-3，1.12×10-2，1.32×10-2和8.66×10-3；相对合成标准不确定度为9.72×10-3，扩展不确定度为0.001 8 mg/kg;当置信水平为95%(k=2)时，测定结果可表示为(0.090±0.001 8) mg/kg。通过评定发现，不确定度的主要影响因素是标准溶液的配制、标准曲线的拟合和回收率，提示在样品检测过程中需严格控制这几个环节。该研究为分散固相萃取-气相色谱技术测定园林土壤中氯氰菊酯残留量检测方法的改进和检测结果的评价提供了参考。
Abstract:
The evaluationof uncertainty is of great importance for improving detection methods and quantitatively characterizing the quality of determination results. In this study, a method based on dispersive solid phase extraction(d-SPE) and gas chromatography(GC) was utilized to quantify cypermethrin residue in landscape soil.The key sources of uncertainty in the measurement process were evaluated, including repeated determination of samples, standard solution preparation, fitness of standard curve, sample weighing and pretreatment, recovery rate, and the measurement of GC. Each uncertainty component was quantified and subsequently combined and expanded following the law of propagation of uncertainty. The results showed that when landscape soil was spiked with cypermethrin at a concentration level of 0.10 mg/kg, the relative standard uncertainty of each component were 7.03×10-3,3.00×10-2,1.63×10-2,8.17×10-3,1.12×10-2,1.32×10-2and 8.66×10-3, respectively.The relative combined standard uncertainty was calculated to be 9.72×10-3, and the expanded uncertainty was determined to be 0.001 8 mg/kg. The determination results of cypermethrin in landscape soil in 95% confidence interval could be expressed as(0.090±0.001 8) mg/kg(k=2). Based on uncertainty evaluation, the main sources of uncertainty came from standard solution preparation, standard curve fitting and recovery rate, indicating that these aspects should be controlled strictly in the following sample analysis.The findings could provide a valuable reference for improving and assessing the accuracy of the d-SPE-GC method for the determination of cypermethrin residue in landscape soil.

参考文献/References:

[1]赵晓娟,孙玉红,高捷,等.我国北方主要园林树木上农药的登记现状分析[J].现代农药,2021,20(6):16-20.

[2]郝雨阳,宋鹏,徐彦军,等.苏州生态涵养区农业土壤中农药残留的分布特征及风险评估[J].农业环境科学学报,2023,42(9):1974-1982.
[3]KANYIKA-MBEWE C,THOLE B,MAKWINJA R, et al. Monitoring of carbaryl and cypermethrin concentrations in water and soil in southern Malawi[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2020,192(9):595.?/div>
[4]GAROIAZ H,BERRABAHA M,ELIDRISSIA A,et al. Analysis of cypermethrin residues and its main degradation products in soil and formulation samples by gas chromatography-electron impact-mass spectrometry in the selective ion monitoring mode[J].International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry,2011,92(12):1378-1388.
[5]BOROWIK A,WYSZKOWSKA J,ZABOROWSKA M,et al.The impact of permethrin and cypermethrin on plants, soil enzyme activity, and microbial communities[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences,2023,24(3):2892.
[6]熊张平,周世萍,解思达,等.不同污染方式进入土壤的氯氰菊酯在蚯蚓体内的蓄积特征及其生长毒性[J].生态毒理学报,2021,16(1):188-195.
[7]TEJADA M,GARC A C,HERN NDEZ T,et al.Response of soil microbial activity and biodiversity in soils polluted with different concentrations of cypermethrin insecticide[J]. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology,2015,69(1):8-19.
[8]翟洪稳,范素芳,王娟,等.测量不确定度在食品检验中的应用及进展[J].食品科学,2021,42(5): 314-320.
[9]杨娟,钟昕,朱世真,等.测量不确定度在微生物检验中的应用及研究进展[J].生物化工, 2021,7(4):119-123.
[10]吴昊,贺小敏,施敏芳,等. ASE-GC/MS法测定水稻田土壤中8种酰胺类农药的不确定度评定研究[J].环境科学与管理,2019, 44(4):123-129.
[11]吴文铸,石利利,郭敏,等.气相色谱法测定土壤中乙虫腈的不确定度评定[J].化学分析计量, 2012, 21(2):10-13.
[12]李婧.土壤中有机磷农药分析过程中不确定度的来源及评定[J].中国环境监测,2011,27(4):15-18.
[13]杨文武,况利平,彭玉峰.气相色谱法测定电子烟烟液中烟碱、丙二醇和丙三醇的不确定度评定[J].化学分析计量, 2023,32(10):108-112.
[14]汪志威,周思齐,李非里,等.实验室农药残留检测的测量不确定度评定——以GB 23200.8—2016测定草莓中4种农药残留为例[J].农药学学报,2020,22(1):105-114.
[15]占永革,龚剑,黄湘燕.关于化学分析回收率不确定度评估公式的思考[J].广州大学学报(自然科学版),2014,13(3): 40-46.
[16]范巧成,范洁.检测结果测量不确定度评定的简化途径和方法[J].理化检验:化学分册,2007,43(11): 974-975.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2023-12-21;修回日期：2023-12-30
基金项目：江苏省农业科技自主创新资金项目“有机物料驱动太湖地区农田土壤质量及碳库演变的长期定位观测研究”[CX(22)3005]；苏州市科技计划项目“生态敏感区HDPE沼液稻田消纳适宜承载量及关键技术研究”(SNG221015)
作者简介：罗红雨(1983- )，女，江苏泗阳人，农艺师。研究方向为园林园艺植物养护。E-mail:luohy_clt@163.com
*通信作者：陆皓茜(1984- )，女，助理研究员，硕士。研究方向为化学分析测试。E-mail: lu-haoqian@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-05-09