[1]王玄,翟飞飞,孙立峰,等.南京市溧水区野猪危害特征及民意调查[J].江苏林业科技,2022,49(05):49-53.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.05.009]
　Wang Xuan,Zhai Feifei,Sun Lifeng,et al.Characteristics of crop damage caused by wild boar (Sus scrofa) and the attitudes of local residents in Lishui District, Nanjing City[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2022,49(05):49-53.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.05.009]
点击复制

南京市溧水区野猪危害特征及民意调查()
分享到：

《江苏林业科技》[ISSN:1001-7380/CN:32-1236/S]

卷:
第49卷
期数:
2022年05期
页码:
49-53
栏目:
试验研究
出版日期:
2022-10-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Characteristics of crop damage caused by wild boar (Sus scrofa) and the attitudes of local residents in Lishui District, Nanjing City
文章编号:
1001-7380（2022）05-0049-05
作者:
王玄1; 2; 翟飞飞3; 孙立峰4; 窦浩5; 曹明明5; 丁晶晶1; 2*
1.江苏省林业科学研究院，江苏 南京 211153；
2.江苏扬州城市森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站，江苏 扬州 225000；
3.江苏省野生动植物保护站， 江苏 南京 210036；
4.南京市林业站，江苏 南京 210019；
5.南京市溧水区林特产技术推广站， 江苏 南京 211222
Author(s):
Wang Xuan1; 2;  Zhai Feifei3;  Sun Lifeng4;  Dou Hao5;  Cao Mingming5;  Ding Jingjing1; 2*
1.Jiangsu Academy of Forestry, Nanjing 211153, China；
2. Yangzhou Urban Forest Ecosystem National Research Station, Jiangsu, Yangzhou 224000, China；
3. Jiangsu Wildlife Protection Station, Nanjing 210036, China；
4. Nanjing Forestry Station, Nanjing 210019, China；
5. Forest Technology Station of Lishui District Nanjing City, Nanjing 211222, China
关键词:
溧水区; 野猪; 危害特征; 居民; 调查
Keywords:
Lishui District; Wild boar; Characteristics of damage; Local resident; Investigation
分类号:
Q958.12+3；Q958.5；Q959.842
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.05.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
近年来，野猪危害农林作物的报道逐年增多，野猪与当地居民对环境资源的竞争和矛盾越来越突出，该研究调查了野猪危害的特征和野猪危害情况，将为后期野猪防控提供基础数据。以南京市溧水区为例，于2021年秋季和冬季，采用问卷调查法和实地访谈相结合的形式，调查该区域野猪危害特征及当地居民对野猪危害的反应。收集了200份有效问卷，溧水区野猪危害的主要农作物有红薯、玉米和花生，危害主要发生在夏季和秋季，危害时间多发生在傍晚和夜间。野猪危害多发生在林地周边、山脚或丘陵山区内的林区。部分受损居民对野猪危害已采取了简单的防控措施，但效果不明显。主管部门应尽早建立快速有效的野猪危害评估与损失补偿机制，并积极引导和增强当地居民对野生动物的容忍度与保护意识，以缓解当前面对的人兽冲突矛盾。
Abstract:
Reports of wild boar harming agricultural and forestry crops are increasing over years. The competition and contradiction between wild boar and local residents on environmental resources are becoming more and more prominent. This study provided basic data for the later prevention and control of wild boar by investigating the characteristics of the damage and residents attitude towards wild boar harm. The status of farmland impacted by wild boar and the tolerance of wild boar by local residents were investigated in and around Lishui District, Nanjing City using a questionnaire and on-site investigations in autumn and winter, 2021. Two hundred valid questionnaires were collected. The main crops damaged were found as sweet potato, corn and peanut. The damage mainly occurred in summer and autumn, especially in the evening and night. Wild boar hazards mostly occurred in the forest areas around the woodland, at the foot of the hills or in the hilly areas. Some damaged residents already took simple prevention and control measures against the hazards, but without obvious effect. We appeal to the administrator to establish a rapid and effective mechanism for wild boar damage assessment and loss compensation mechanism as soon as possible, and actively guide protection awareness and enhance the tolerance of wild animals of local residents, so as to alleviate the current human-animal conflicts.

参考文献/References:

[1]粟海军,胡灿实,张明明,等.贵州赤水桫椤国家级自然保护区野猪危害特征与居民态度分析[J]. 兽类学报,2018,38(4):359-368.
[2]张丹,刘丙万.黑龙江青云林场野猪危害调查及防治[J]. 野生动物,2012,33(2):59-63.
[3]李汀一,张明海,韩俊武,等.黑龙江张广才岭西麓野猪种群数量与危害调查及管理对策[J]. 野生动物,2010,31(2):99-103.
[4]陈凤莲,马玲,潘汉世,等.广西野猪猪瘟病毒感染情况的调查报告[J]. 中国畜牧兽医,2007, 34(8):75-77.
[5]张静.小兴安岭南坡野猪栖息地选择及对农田危害的研究[D]. 哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2008.
[6]王岩.黄泥河自然保护区原居住民与野猪冲突研究[D]. 吉林:吉林农业大学,2017.
[7]周学红,马建章,张伟,等.珲春自然保护区居民对野猪的容受性及其影响因素分析[J]. 资源科学,2008,30(6):876-882.
[8]张鸣天,刘丙万.人与野猪冲突现状及防控研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学,2015,43(12):151-153.
[9]CAPPA F,LOMBARDINI M,MERIGGI A. Influence of seasonality, environmental and anthropic factors on crop damage by wild boar Sus scrofa[J]. Folia Zoologica,2019,68(4):261-268.
[10]BALLARI S A,BAARRIOS-GARCA M N. A review of wild boar Sus scrofa diet and factors affecting food selection in native and introduced ranges[J]. Mammal Review,2014,44(2):124-134.
[11]BOYCE C,VERCAUTEREN K C,BEASLEY J C. Timing and extent of crop damage by wild pigs (Sus scrofa Linnaeus) to corn and peanut fields[J]. Crop Protection,2020,133:105-131.
[12]徐飞,蔡体久,琚存勇,等.保护区及周边居民对野猪容忍性的影响因素——以黑龙江凤凰山国家级自然保护区为例[J]. 生态学报,2013,33(18):5935-5942.
[13]王莉,卜书海,宋华东,等.西安市秦岭山地村民对野猪容忍性的研究[J]. 四川动物,2020,39(5):563-571.
[14]宋军,李伟,张海军,等.白石砬子地区野猪生态习性观察与食性分析[J]. 辽宁林业科技,2005(2):25-26.
[15]邓天鹏,郑合勋,曾国仕.伏牛山北坡野猪(Sus scrofa) 泥浴场的生境特征[J]. 生态学报,2009,29(2):1001-1008.
[16]余海慧,吴建平,樊育英.辽宁东部地区野猪危害调查[J]. 野生动物,2009,30(3):124-128.
[17]LIU Q, YAN K, LU Y F, et al.Conflict between wild boars (Sus scrofa) and farmers: distribution, impacts, and suggestions for management of wild boars in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Journal of Mountain Science,2019,16(10):2404-2416.
[18]唐冬艳.野猪与人冲突认知与防控对策调查研究[D]. 哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2021.
[19]MUHLY T B,MUSIANI M. Livestock depredation by wolves and the ranching economy in the Northwestern US[J]. Ecological Economics,2009,68(8-9):2439-2450.
[20]MCKEE S, ANDERSON A, CARLISLE K, et al. Economic estimates of invasive wild pig damage to crops in 12 US states[J]. Crop Protection,2020,132:105-105.
[21]宋琪,刘丙万.太阳能警示灯对野猪危害农田影响研究[J]. 动物学杂志,2018,53(1):32-39.
[22]崔爽,刘丙万.野猪危害防控措施时间延续性及空间推广性研究[J]. 兽类学报,2020,40(4):364.
[23]李祎斌,陈楚,刘丙万.吉林省珲春地区人与野生动物冲突现状与防控调查[J]. 野生动物学报,2018,39(4):962-965.
[24]谢文芳,宋军平,苏海萍,等.西双版纳国家级自然保护区野生动物肇事补偿现状及缓解对策[J]. 林业调查规划,2020,45(2):182-186.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2022-07-19修回日期：2022-08-23
基金项目：江苏省林业科技创新与推广项目“江苏重点地区野猪种群及非洲猪瘟病源监测研究”（LYKJ[2021]24）；江苏省林业科技创新与推广项目“江苏省森林、湿地定位监测长期科研基地”（LYKJ[2020]21）
作者简介：王玄（1990- ），男，江苏泗洪人，助理研究员，硕士。主要从事动物生态学研究。E-mail：xuanzaiwang@163.com
*通信作者：丁晶晶（1982- ），女，江苏盐城人，副研究员，博士。主要从事动物生态学研究。E-mail：sunshinedjj@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-01-03