[1]王璐,游宁龙*,颜子淳,等.福州市老城区公园绿地布局社会公平绩效评价[J].江苏林业科技,2022,49(05):24-29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.05.005]
 Wang Lu,You Ninglong*,Yan Zichun,et al.Social equity performance evaluation of urban park green space layout in old city of Fuzhou[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2022,49(05):24-29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.05.005]
点击复制

福州市老城区公园绿地布局社会公平绩效评价()
分享到:

《江苏林业科技》[ISSN:1001-7380/CN:32-1236/S]

卷:
第49卷
期数:
2022年05期
页码:
24-29
栏目:
试验研究
出版日期:
2022-10-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Social equity performance evaluation of urban park green space layout in old city of Fuzhou
文章编号:
1001-7380(2022)05-0024-06
作者:
王璐游宁龙*颜子淳蓝承威
福建农林大学风景园林与艺术学院,福建 福州 350100
Author(s):
Wang LuYou Ninglong* Yan Zichun Lan Chengwei
College of Landscape Architecture,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350100,China
关键词:
城市公园绿地社会公平绩效评价基尼系数区位熵空间分布
Keywords:
UrbanPark green spaceSocial equity performanceEvaluationGini coefficientLocational entropySpatial distribution
分类号:
Q143.+4X171.4X21X321
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.05.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
现有城市公园绿地布局社会公平绩效的有效评价,对优化城市公园绿地系统、提高居民生活质量和幸福感至关重要。该文以福州市老城区为例,以公园绿地服务覆盖度表征其服务水平,引入各类型公园绿地权重系数对其进行改进,结合基尼系数和区位熵,旨在建立起以服务水平为基础的城市公园绿地布局的社会公平绩效评价方法,以便更加深入地探讨老城区城市公园绿地社会公平绩效的空间分布格局。研究结果显示:(1)福州市城市公园绿地布局的基尼系数为0.28,公平性整体较好,但人均享有城市公园绿地资源水平差异较大;(2)城市公园绿地的社会公平绩效呈现北高南低的现象,公平性较低的街道主要分布于仓山区和晋安区,数量占比约为40%。研究可为城市公园绿地系统规划的评价和优化提供一定科学依据。
Abstract:
Effective evaluation of the social equity performance of existing urban park green space layouts is crucial to optimizing urban park green space systems and improving the quality of life and well-being of residents. In this article, with the old city of Fuzhou as an example, an evaluation method was established based on the service coverage to characterize its service level, weighting coefficients for each type of park green space. And by combining the Gini coefficient and locational entropy, the spatial distribution pattern of the social equity performance of urban park green space in old urban areas was explored in more depth. The results showed that (1) the Gini coefficient of urban park green space layout in Fuzhou was 0.28, with good equity overall, but the level of per capita enjoyment of urban park green space resources varied greatly;(2) the social equity performance of urban park green space showed a phenomenon of highness in the north and lowness in the south, especislly the streets with lower equity mainly distributed in District Cangshan and District Jinan, with the number accounting for about 40%. The above results could provide some scientific basis for the evaluation and optimization of urban park green space system planning.

参考文献/References:

[1]CHEN T T, LANG W, LI X. Exploring the impact of urban green space on residents health in Guangzhou, China[J]. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2020,146(1): 19-22.
[2]ZHU Z P, LI J Y, CHEN Z R. Green space equity: spatial distribution of urban green spaces and correlation with urbanization in Xiamen, China[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2022,24(10):1-21.
[3]黄经南,朱恺易.基于POI数据的武汉市公共服务设施布局社会公平绩效评价[J].现代城市研究,2021(6):24-30.
[4]唐子来,顾姝.上海市中心城区公共绿地分布的社会绩效评价:从地域公平到社会公平[J].城市规划学刊,2015(2):48-56.
[5]陈雯,王远飞.城市公园区位分配公平性评价研究——以上海市外环线以内区域为例[J].安徽师范大学学报(自然科学版),2009,32(4):373-377.
[6]陈秋晓,侯焱,吴霜.机会公平视角下绍兴城市公园绿地可达性评价[J].地理科学,2016,36(3):375-383.
[7]NGOM R, GOSSELIN P, BLAIS C. Reduction of disparities in access to green spaces: Their geographic insertion and recreational functions matter[J]. Applied Geography,2016,66:35-51.
[8]江海燕,周春山,肖荣波.广州公园绿地的空间差异及社会公平研究[J].城市规划,2010,34(4):43-48.
[9]孙喆,阿拉太,张珣.城市公园绿地空间布局的公平性量化评估——以北京六环内公园为例[J].西部人居环境学刊,2020,35(5):83-90.
[10]吴健生,司梦林,李卫锋.供需平衡视角下的城市公园绿地空间公平性分析——以深圳市福田区为例[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(9):2831-2838.
[11]赵兵,李露露,曹林.基于GIS的城市公园绿地服务范围分析及布局优化研究——以花桥国际商务城为例[J].中国园林,2015,31(6):95-99.
[12]金远.对城市绿地指标的分析[J].中国园林,2006(8):56-60.
[13]戚荣昊,杨航,王思玲,等.基于百度POI数据的城市公园绿地评估与规划研究[J].中国园林,2018,34(3):32-37.
[14]CHENG P, MIN M, HU W Y, et al. A framework for fairness evaluation and improvement of urban green space: A case of Wuhan metropolitan area in China[J]. Forests, 2021,12(7):890.
[15]TSURUMI T, IMAUJI A, MANAGI S. Greenery and subjective well-being: Assessing the monetary value of greenery by type[J]. Ecological Economics, 2018,148:152-169.
[16]唐子来,江可馨.轨道交通网络的社会公平绩效评价——以上海市中心城区为例[J].城市交通,2016,14(2):75-82.
[17]王敏,朱安娜,汪洁琼,等.基于社会公平正义的城市公园绿地空间配置供需关系——以上海徐汇区为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(19):7035-7046.
[18]杨辉,张晓荣.社会公平理念下城市公园绿地空间布局方法研究——以陕西省子长县城为例[J].现代城市研究,2018(9):77-83.
[19]唐子来,顾姝.再议上海市中心城区公共绿地分布的社会绩效评价:从社会公平到社会正义[J].城市规划学刊,2016(1):15-21.
[20]崔亚鸽,潘辉,谭文浩,等.城市防灾公园绿地服务的绩效评价——以福州市中心主城区为例[J].闽江学院学报,2022,43(2):118-128.
[21]匡纬,李莎,周慧荻.城市公园绿地布局公平性精准化评价方法研究——以北京市海淀区为例[J].华中农业大学学报,2022,41(1):160-169.
[22]王小月,杨东峰.建成环境如何影响老年人绿地使用频率——基于可达性和吸引力双重视角[J].中国园林,2020,36(11):62-66.

相似文献/References:

[1]田星凯,范爱淇,韦俊宇,等.城市湿地景观植物的种类及其在应用养护中存在的问题与对策[J].江苏林业科技,2020,47(04):50.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.04.012]
[2]范祝连,万松,邓双,等.基于GIS的山地丘陵城市生态敏感性分析——以福建省泉州市为例[J].江苏林业科技,2022,49(04):12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.04.003]
 Fan Zhulian,Wan Song,Deng Shuang,et al.GIS based ecological sensitivity analysis of mountainous and hilly cities—Taking Quanzhou City, Fujian Province as an example[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2022,49(05):12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.04.003]
[3]李贝.鸟类友好型动物园的营建——以南京市红山森林动物园为例[J].江苏林业科技,2023,50(05):39.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2023.05.008]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-07-30修回日期:2022-08-28
基金项目:福建省中青年教师教育科研项目“基于城市网络分析系统和街道可步行性对居民步行活动影响”(JAT210071);福建农林大学学科交叉融合引导“‘工·艺’融合视角下海峡人居环境创新研究项目”(YSYL-xkjc-3)
作者简介:王璐(1999- ),女,河南郑州人,硕士生研究生。从事园林与景观设计研究。
*通信作者:游宁龙(1988- ),男,福建仙游人,讲师,硕士生导师。从事空间分析与环境健康研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-01-03