[1]赵珍妮,童再康,赖江*.4种高山杜鹃容器苗对持续干旱胁迫和复水的生理响应研究[J].江苏林业科技,2021,48(05):13-19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2021.05.002]
　Zhao Zhenni,Tong Zaikang,Lai Jiang*.Physiological response of four azalea seedlings after drought stress and rewatering[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2021,48(05):13-19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2021.05.002]
点击复制

4种高山杜鹃容器苗对持续干旱胁迫和复水的生理响应研究()
分享到：

《江苏林业科技》[ISSN:1001-7380/CN:32-1236/S]

卷:
第48卷
期数:
2021年05期
页码:
13-19
栏目:
试验研究
出版日期:
2021-10-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Physiological response of four azalea seedlings after drought stress and rewatering
文章编号:
1001-7380（2021）05-0013-07
作者:
赵珍妮1; 童再康1; 赖江2*
1.浙江农林大学亚热带森林培育国家重点实验室,浙江 杭州 311300；
2.建德市林业局，浙江 建德 311600
Author(s):
Zhao Zhenni1;  Tong Zaikang1;  Lai Jiang2*
1. The State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang Agricultural and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China;
2. Forestry Bureau of Jiande City, Jiande 311600, China
关键词:
高山杜鹃; 容器苗; 干旱胁迫; 生理响应; 主成分分析
Keywords:
Alpine azalea; Container Seedling; Drought stress; Physiological response;  Principal Component Analysis
分类号:
Q945.78；S685.21
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2021.05.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为评价高山杜鹃品种的耐旱性及对干旱胁迫的生理响应，以乡土树种云锦杜鹃为参照，系统测定了莱姆、弗吉尼亚、惠特尼3个常绿高山杜鹃品种在持续干旱胁迫和复水条件下的光合参数、叶绿素荧光参数、渗透调节物质等生理生化指标。结果表明，随干旱胁迫加剧，4种高山杜鹃的光合参数、叶绿素荧光参数均呈下降趋势；4种高山杜鹃的叶片水势均呈下降趋势，云锦杜鹃叶片水势下降幅度最小；4种高山杜鹃的相对电导率、渗透调节物质含量及H2O2含量均有所增加，在严重干旱时达到最大值。重度干旱下弗吉尼亚受到不可逆转的损伤，复水10 d后，除弗吉尼亚全部枯死无法恢复外，云锦杜鹃、莱姆和惠特尼的各项指标均恢复并接近对照水平。经主成分分析,将14个生理生化指标简化为累计贡献率为88.67 %的2个综合指标，综合评价得到耐旱性排序为云锦杜鹃>莱姆>惠特尼>弗吉尼亚。
Abstract:
To evaluate the drought tolerance of alpine azalea varieties and their physiological responses to drought stress, with the native tree species Rhododendron fortunei as a reference, the photosynthetic parameters, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, and osmotic adjustment of three evergreen alpine Rhododendron varieties, including ‘Halfdem lem ’, ‘ Virginia Richards’ and ‘Ann Rose Whitney’, were systematically determined. The results showed that the photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of all four alpine azalea tested tended to decrease as drought stress intensified; the leaf water potential of four alpine azalea tended to decrease, with the smallest decrease in leaf water potential of R. fortunei; The relative conductivity and osmotic adjustment substance content of four alpine azalea increased, reaching a maximum during severe drought. Except for ‘Virginia Richards’, irreversibly damaged, which could not recover, all indicators of the other three recovered and were close to control levels after ten days of re-watering. After Principal Component Analysis, the 14 physiological and biochemical indicators were simplified into 2 comprehensive indicators with a cumulative contribution rate of 88.67%. Their drought tolerance was presented by comprehensive evaluation in order as R. fortunei >‘Halfdem lem’ >‘Ann Rose Whitney’ >‘Virginia Richards’.

参考文献/References:

[1]兰熙,张乐华,张金政,等.杜鹃花属植物育种研究进展[J].园艺学报, 2012,39(9):1829-1838.
[2]陈婷,李世峰,瞿素萍,等.18个高山杜鹃品种在滇中地区的生长适应性[J].西南农业学报,2019,32(3):609-614.
[3]李丹丹,李晓花,张乐华.杜鹃花属植物干旱胁迫研究进展[J/OL].广西植物:1-14[2021-10-11].https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.zafu.edu.cn/kcms/detail/45.1134.Q.20201013.1405.002.html
[4]CRAMER G R, URANO K, DELROT S, et al. Effects of abiotic stress on plants: a systems biology perspective [J]. BMC Plant Biology,2011,11(1):163.
[5]张珏,黄瑞芳,韩杰峰.乔木柳4个无性系耐旱性的初步研究[J].江苏林业科技,2020,47(6):47-49.
[6]CHAVES M M, PEREIRA J S, MAROCO J, et al. How plants cope with water stress in the field? Photosynthesis and growth[J]. Annals of Botany,2002,89(7):907-916.
[7]马鹏里,韩兰英,张旭东,等.气候变暖背景下中国干旱变化的区域特征[J].中国沙漠,2019,39(6):209-215.
[8]MAYR S, BEIKIRCHER B, OBKIRCHER M A, et al. Hydraulic plasticity and limitations of alpine Rhododendron species [J]. Oecologia,2010,164(2):321-330.
[9]党宏忠,周泽福,赵雨森.祁连山水源区主要树种耐旱性研究[J].应用生态学报,2015,16(12):2241-2247.
[10]王华,张石虎,龚雪梅,等.不同水分条件下杜鹃花转录因子的转录组分析[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2018,26(5):515-522.
[11]NILSEN E T, JOHNSON C, TAYLOR M K. Are idioblasts related to drought resistance in Rhododendron section Schistanthe? [J]. Journal of the American Rhododendron Society,2014,96:73-79.
[12]CAI Y F, WANG J H, ZHANG L, et al. Physiological and transcriptomic analysis highlight key metabolic pathways in relation to drought tolerance in Rhododendron delavayi [J]. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants,2019,25(4):991-1008.
[13]黄承玲,陈训,高贵龙.3种高山杜鹃对持续干旱的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J].林业科学,2011,47(6):48-55.
[14]陈荣建,熊丹,欧静,等.持续干旱下杜鹃花类菌根真菌对桃叶杜鹃内源激素的影响[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2018,40(3):26-33.
[15]柯世省,杨敏文.水分胁迫对云锦杜鹃光合特性日变化的影响[J].福建林业科技,2007,34(3):10-14.
[16]柯世省,杨敏文.水分胁迫对云锦杜鹃光合生理和光温响应的影响[J].园艺学报,2007,34(4):959-64.
[17]柯世省.土壤干旱胁迫对云锦杜鹃水分利用效率的影响[J].河南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2007,35(2):150-153.
[18]林海明,张文霖.主成分分析与因子分析的异同和SPSS软件——兼与刘玉玫、卢纹岱等同志商榷[J].统计研究,2005(3):65-69.
[19]FARQUHAR G D, SHARKEY T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology,1982,33(3):317-345.
[20]吴雪仪,陈红跃,黄永芳,等.干旱胁迫对6种园林灌木光合生理特性的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2019,47(22):142-147.
[21]李素,万林,李心昊,等. 3种类型油菜对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J].中国油料作物学报,2020,42(4)：563-572.
[22]张玉玉,王进鑫,马戌,等.土壤干旱及复水对侧柏叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(2):242-247,255.
[23]谢志玉,张文辉.干旱和复水对文冠果生长及生理生态特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(6):1759-1767.
[24]杨明凤,王金梅,吉春容,等.干旱胁迫对棉花生长发育和光合荧光参数的影响[J]. 中国农学通报,2021,37(13):22-28.
[25]易家宁,王康才,张琪绮,等.干旱胁迫对紫苏生长及品质的影响[J]. 核农学报,2020,34(6):1320-1326.
[26]吴强盛,夏仁学,张琼华.果树对水分胁迫反应研究进展[J].亚热带植物科学,2003,32(2):72-76.
[27]洪震,刘术新,洪琮浩,等.5种造林树种对干旱胁迫的抗性应答[J].南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）,2021,45(2):111-119.
[28]仝倩,施明,贺建勋,等.5种葡萄砧木耐旱性评价及鉴定指标的筛选[J].核农学报,2018,32(9):1814-1820.

相似文献/References:

[1]郁春柳.纳塔栎容器育苗基质筛选[J].江苏林业科技,2016,43(01):18.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.01.005]
　YU Chun-liu.Substrate selection for container seedling breeding of Quercus nuttalliiPalmer[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2016,43(05):18.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.01.005]
[2]冯粉定,张雅婷,王昌明,等.金桂容器苗与地栽苗造林的生长差异研究[J].江苏林业科技,2016,43(03):34.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.03.009]
[3]潘 林,祝亚云蒋泽平*,谢 健,等.添加园林废弃物堆肥基质对栓皮栎容器苗生长的影响[J].江苏林业科技,2018,45(01):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.01.007]
　PAN Lin,ZHU Ya-yun,JIANG Ze-ping*,et al.Effect of green waste compost substrate on containerized Quercus variabilis seedling growth[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2018,45(05):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.01.007]
[4]董筱昀,黄利斌,吕运舟,等.遮荫处理对高温胁迫下4种栎树幼苗光合生理的影响[J].江苏林业科技,2019,46(05):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2019.05.002]
[5]徐永宏,盛卫星*,周振琪,等.不同基质配比对刨花楠幼苗生长及养分吸收的影响[J].江苏林业科技,2020,47(06):7.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.06.002]
　Xu Yonghong,Sheng Weixing*,Zhou Zhenqi,et al.Effect of substrate proportion on the growth and nutrient absorption in Machilus pauho seedlings[J].Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science &Technology,2020,47(05):7.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2020.06.002]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2021-07-20;修回日期：2021-08-27
基金项目：浙江省农业新品种重大专项花卉育种专项“高山杜鹃良种选育与繁殖技术研究”（2021C02071-2）
作者简介：赵珍妮（1997- ），女，浙江杭州人，在读研究生。主要从事林业良种工程研究。E-mail：854740553@qq.com
*通信作者：赖江（1982- ），男，浙江建德人，工程师，硕士。主要从事森林培育研究。E-mail：21502041@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-12-02